网站首页期刊介绍通知公告编 委 会投稿须知电子期刊广告合作联系我们
最新消息:
AIS患者术后急性疼痛控制与慢性术后疼痛发生及生活质量的关系研究
作者:陈静  郑金凤 
单位:南京鼓楼医院 脊柱外科10B, 江苏 南京 210000
关键词:青少年特发性脊柱侧弯 后路脊柱融合术 慢性术后疼痛 生活质量 预测模型 受试者工作特征曲线 
分类号:R687.3
出版年·卷·期(页码):2026·54·第七期(1097-1105)
摘要:

目的:探讨青少年特发性脊柱侧弯(AIS)后路脊柱融合术后急性疼痛控制与慢性术后疼痛(CPSP)的发生情况及生活质量的关系,并构建CPSP早期风险预测模型。方法:采用单中心回顾性队列研究设计,纳入2022年9月至2025年6月于本院接受后路脊柱融合术的312例AIS患者。记录术后24、48、72 h视觉模拟评分(VAS);于术前及术后3、6、12个月采用术前脊柱侧弯研究学会-22r修订版(SRS-22r)量表评估生活质量。根据术后3个月VAS>3分将患者分为CPSP组与非CPSP组。采用多因素Logistic回归分析CPSP的相关因素,构建受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线及联合预测模型,并通过线性混合效应模型分析两组生活质量变化轨迹。进一步根据术后48 h平均VAS(静息痛与活动痛VAS的均值)进行疼痛分层分析,比较不同疼痛水平患者的远期结局。结果:患者术后24 h中重度疼痛发生率为76.3%,术后72 h降至32.1%;术后3个月CPSP发生率为23.1%(72/312)。术后12个月SRS-22r总分由术前(3.47±0.41)分升至(4.22±0.35)分(P<0.001)。多因素Logistic分析显示,术后48 h平均VAS≥5分(OR=2.77,95%CI:1.63~4.70,P<0.001)及术前SRS-22r总分<3.5分(OR=2.10,95%CI:1.26~3.49,P=0.004)是CPSP发生的独立影响因素。ROC曲线分析显示,术后 48 h 平均 VAS、术前 SRS-22r 总分预测 CPSP 的曲线下面积(AUC) 分别为 0.761、0.728;二者联合模型 AUC 达 0.846,判别效能显著优于单一指标(P=0.006)。线性混合效应模型提示,时间、分组主效应及时间×分组交互效应均有统计学意义(均P<0.05),校正基线后两组生活质量差异随时间增加逐渐增大。疼痛分层分析显示,术后48 h高疼痛组(VAS≥5分)CPSP发生率更高,术后12个月SRS-22r总分显著更低(均P<0.001)。结论:AIS后路脊柱融合术后CPSP发生率较高,并与远期生活质量下降相关。术后48 h内急性疼痛控制不佳、术前生活质量较差是CPSP发生的独立危险因素,联合两项指标构建的预测模型具备良好的早期风险识别能力。

Objective: To explore the relationship between acute pain control, the incidence of chronic post-surgical pain(CPSP) and quality of life in adolescents idiopathic scoliosis(AIS) after posterior spinal fusion, and to establish an early risk prediction model for postoperative CPSP. Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted. A total of 312 AIS patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion in our hospital from September 2022 to June 2025 were enrolled. The Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) scores were recorded at 24, 48 and 72 h postoperatively. The Scoliosis Research Society-22r(SRS-22r) questionnaire was used to assess quality of life before surgery and at 3, 6 and 12 months after operation. Patients were divided into the CPSP group and the non-CPSP group according to a VAS score>3 points at 3 months postoperatively. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with CPSP. Receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curves and a combined prediction model were constructed. A linear mixed-effects model was adopted to analyze the changing trajectory of quality of life between the two groups. In addition, patients were stratified by the mean VAS score(average of resting pain and activity pain VAS) at 48 h postoperatively, and the long-term outcomes were compared among patients with different pain levels. Results: The incidence of moderate-to-severe pain was 76.3% at 24 h postoperatively, which decreased to 32.1% at 72 h. The overall incidence of CPSP at 3 months after surgery was 23.1%(72/312). The total SRS-22r score increased from(3.47±0.41) points preoperatively to(4.22±0.35) points at 12 months postoperatively(P<0.001). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis revealed that a mean VAS score ≥5 points at 48 h postoperatively(OR=2.77, 95%CI:1.63-4.70, P<0.001) and a preoperative SRS-22r total score<3.5 points(OR=2.10, 95%CI:1.26-3.49, P=0.004) were independent influencing factors for CPSP. ROC curves analysis showed that the area under the curve(AUC) of the mean VAS score at 48 h postoperatively and the preoperative SRS-22r total score for predicting CPSP was 0.761 and 0.728, respectively. The AUC of the combined model reached 0.846, which was significantly superior to that of single indicators(P=0.006). The linear mixed-effects model indicated that the main effects of time and grouping, as well as the time-by-group interaction effect, were all statistically significant(all P<0.05), and the between-group difference in quality of life gradually increased over time after adjusting for baseline data. Stratified analysis demonstrated that the high-pain group(mean VAS ≥5 points at 48 h postoperatively) had a higher incidence of CPSP and a significantly lower total SRS-22r score at 12 months postoperatively(all P<0.001). Conclusion: The incidence of CPSP is relatively high after posterior spinal fusion for AIS, which is correlated with the decline of long-term quality of life. Poor control of acute pain within 48 h after surgery and low preoperative quality of life are independent risk factors for CPSP. The prediction model combining the two indicators has a good capability for early risk identification.

参考文献:

[1] WEINSTEIN S L,DOLAN L A,CHENG J C,et al.Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis[J].Lancet,2008,371(9623):1527-1537.
[2] NEGRINI S,DONZELLI S,AULISA A G,et al.2016 SOSORT guidelines:orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth[J].Scoliosis Spinal Disord,2018,13(1):3.
[3] LONNER B S,REN Y,YASZAY B,et al.Evolution of surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis over 20 years:have outcomes improved?[J].Spine,2018,43(6):402-410.
[4] EINHORN L M,MONITTO C L,GANESH A,et al.Multi-institutional study of multimodal analgesia practice,pain trajectories,and recovery trends after spine fusion for idiopathic scoliosis[J].Anesth Analg,2025,141(5):1137-1148.
[5] SCHUG S A,LAVAND'HOMME P,BARKE A,et al.The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11:chronic postsurgical or posttraumatic pain[J].Pain,2019,160(1):45-52.
[6] LANDMAN Z,OSWALD T,SANDERS J,et al.Prevalence and predictors of pain in surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis[J].Spine,2011,36(10):825-829.
[7] CHIDAMBARAN V,DING L,MOORE D L,et al.Predicting the pain continuum after adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery:a prospective cohort study[J].Eur J Pain,2017,21(7):1252-1265.
[8] KEHLET H,JENSEN T S,WOOLF C J.Persistent postsurgical pain:risk factors and prevention[J].Lancet,2006,367(9522):1618-1625.
[9] ROSENBERGER P H,JOKL P,ICKOVICS J.Psychosocial factors and surgical outcomes:an evidence-based literature review[J].J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2006,14(7):397-405.
[10] FREYNHAGEN R,BARON R,GOCKEL U,et al.PainDETECT:a new screening questionnaire to identify neuropathic components in patients with back pain[J].Curr Med Res Opin,2006,22(10):1911-1920.
[11] CHANG X,YAO S,WEI J,et al.The validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the PainDETECT questionnaire in osteoarthritis-related pain[J].J Orthop Surg Res,2025,20(1):94.
[12] ASHER M,MINLAI S,BURTON D,et al.The reliability and concurrent validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis[J].Spine,2003,28(1):63-69.
[13] 朱丽,张芳,梁培荣,等.青少年特发性脊柱侧弯患者术后慢性疼痛的研究进展[J].中华现代护理杂志,2025,31(1):116-122.
[14] BAILEY K M,HOWARD J J,EL-HAWARY R,et al.Pain trajectories following adolescent idiopathic scoliosis correction:analysis of predictors and functional outcomes[J].JBJS Open Access,2021,6(2):e20.00122.
[15] WOOLF C J.Central sensitization:Implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain[J].Pain,2011,152(3):S2-S15.
[16] CARREON L Y,SANDERS J O,DIAB M,et al.The minimum clinically important difference in scoliosis research society-22 appearance,activity,and pain domains after surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis[J].Spine,2010,35(23):2079-2083.
[17] PISHNAMAZ M,MIGLIORINI F,BLUME C,et al.Long-term outcomes of spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis:a literature review[J].Eur J Med Res,2024,29(1):534.
[18] ZYGOGIANNIS K,KOMAITIS S,CHRISTAKAKIS P C,et al.Long-term life-quality outcomes after corrective adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery:10-year postoperative assessment comparing lenke classification and fused levels[J].Maedica,2025,20(4):771-778.
[19] ZHAO Z,MAHESHATI A,ZHANG X,et al.Factors influencing the quality of life following posterior approach surgical treatment in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis:a 2-year follow-up study[J].J Orthop Surg Res,2025,20(1):921.
[20] LUO C,DENG Z,LI J,et al.Health-related quality of life(HRQOL) outcomes of selective/nonselective thoracic fusion for lenke 1C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis(AIS) patients with a minimum 4-year follow-up[J].Orthop Surg,2024,16(2):429-436.
[21] LLOYD A,HARDING I,COLE A,et al.Patient-reported outcomes following surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis performed in adolescence versus adulthood[J].Annals,2025,107(4):257-261.
[22] 赵智娴,袁羽翔,祝明秋.针对性健康教育方案联合心理支持在青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者中的应用[J].中西医结合护理(中英文),2025,11(1):33-36.
[23] GROSSI P.Enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS) protocols in orthopaedic surgery:opioids or not opioids?[J].J Pain Res,2025,18:1683-1695.
[24] KERR J,ABRAHAM E,VANDEWINT A,et al.Predicting health-related quality of life outcomes following major scoliosis surgery in adolescents:a latent class growth analysis[J].Glob Spine J,2024,14(3):902-913.
[25] JAMALI M,LITTLE J P,LUNDINE K,et al.A retrospective,multicentre comparison of continuous epidural analgesia and patient-controlled analgesia following posterior spinal instrumented fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis[J].Med Res Arch,2025,13(10):201-210.

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录
您是第 1343521 位访问者


 ©《现代医学》编辑部
联系电话:025-83272481;83272479
电子邮件: xdyx@pub.seu.edu.cn

本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626

苏ICP备09058541