网站首页期刊介绍通知公告编 委 会投稿须知电子期刊广告合作联系我们
最新消息:
苯磺酸瑞马唑仑全凭静脉麻醉用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的应用效果观察
作者:梁栋梁  唐在荣  姚娟  刘颖  徐知菲 
单位:高邮市中医医院 麻醉科, 江苏 高邮 225600
关键词:苯磺酸瑞马唑仑 全凭静脉麻醉 腹腔镜胆囊切除术 
分类号:R614
出版年·卷·期(页码):2025·53·第十一期(1769-1773)
摘要:

目的: 观察苯磺酸瑞马唑仑复合瑞芬太尼全凭静脉麻醉用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)中的临床效果。方法: 选择本院2023年6月至2024年2月行LC患者60例,男26例、女34例,年龄23~73岁,体质指数(BMI)20.2~26.5 kg·m-2,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级Ⅰ或Ⅱ级,患者随机分为苯磺酸瑞马唑仑组(R组)与丙泊酚组(B组),每组30例。B组以200 mL·h-1静脉泵注1% 丙泊酚,R组以200 mL·h-1静脉泵注0.15%苯磺酸瑞马唑仑行麻醉诱导;气管插管成功后两组患者以6~8 μg·(kg·h)-1速率泵注瑞芬太尼,B组以3~4 mg·(kg·h)-1速率静脉输注丙泊酚、 R组以1 mg·(kg·h)-1持续输注苯磺酸瑞马唑仑,维持脑电双频指数(BIS)值于40~60之间,并根据手术时程适时追加罗库溴铵0.2 mg·kg-1。记录两组患者患者诱导前(T0)、诱导结束即刻(T1)、气管插管后即刻(T2)、手术开始前(T3)、手术开始30 min(T4)及手术结束时(T5)等各时间点的患者BIS、心率(HR)与平均动脉压MAP等数据;观察并记录两组患者术后气管导管拔除时间、气管导管拔除后15 min警觉/镇静评分(OAA/S)、麻醉恢复室(PACU)停留时间,并记录患者恶心、呕吐与术中知晓等不良反应情况;术后随访3 d,观察两组患者术后谵妄发生情况。结果: 两组患者诱导时皆可快速达到预设的BIS值,麻醉过程中BIS值平稳,虽然B组患者BIS值下降的幅度较 R 组明显,但两组患者诱导时间差异无统计学意义,t=1.124,P>0.05; 术中B组患者心血管活性药物去氧肾上腺素使用人次较R组增加(B组16例、R组4例), χ2=7.612,P<0.05,差异有统计学意义;B组患者术后拔管时间短于R组,t=5.22,P<0.05,但恢复室停留时间及拔管后OAA/S镇静评分差异无统计学意义;两组患者未发生术中知晓情况且术后不良反应无统计学意义。结论: 与丙泊酚相比,苯磺酸瑞马唑仑可安全有效的应用于LC全身麻醉诱导及维持,作用迅速且完善,对心血管系统影响更小。

Objective: To observe the clinical effect of remifentanil combined with rimazolen benzenesulfonate for total intravenous anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC). Methods: Sixty patients who underwent LC in our hospital from June 2023 to February 2024 were enrolled, including 26 males and 34 females, aged 23-73 years, with body mass index(BMI) 20.2-26.5 kg·m-2, and the American Society of anesthesiologists(ASA) grade Ⅰ or Ⅱ. They were randomly assigned to remifentanil besylate group(group R, n=30) or propofol group(group B, n=30). Group B received intravenous infusion of 1% propofol at a rate of 200 mL·h-1, while group R received intravenous infusion of 0.15% remifentanil besylate at a rate of 200 mL·h-1 for anesthesia induction. After successful tracheal intubation, both groups of patients were administered remifentanil at a rate of 6-8 μg·(kg·h)-1. Group B received intravenous infusion of propofol at a rate of 3-4 mg·(kg·h)-1, while group R received continuous infusion of remifentanil besylate at a rate of 1 mg·(kg·h)-1, maintaining a bispectral index(BIS) value between 40 and 60. Rocuronium bromide was added at a rate of 0.2 mg·kg-1 according to the surgical duration. The BIS, heart rate(HR), and mean arterial pressure(MAP) data of two groups were recorded before induction(T0), immediately after induction(T1), immediately after endotracheal intubation(T2), before surgery(T3), 30 min after surgery(T4), and at the end of surgery(T5). The postoperative time of tracheal tube removal, the observer's assessment of alertness/sedation scale(OAA/S) at 15 min after tracheal tube removal, the duration of stay in the post anesthesia care unit(PACU) of the two groups were observed and recorded, and the adverse reactions such as nausea, vomiting, and intraoperative awareness were recorded. The patients were followed up for 3 d after surgery to observe the occurrence of postoperative delirium. Results: Both groups rapidly achieved the preset BIS value during induction, and the BIS value remained stable during anesthesia. Although the decrease in BIS value was more significant in group B than in group R, there was no significant difference in induction time between the two groups(t=1.124, P>0.05). During the operation, the number of patients who used the cardiovascular active drug epinephrine was significantly higher in group B than in group R(χ2=7.612, P<0.05). The postoperative extubation time of group B patients was shorter than that of group R(t=5.22, P<0.05). However, there were no significant differences in the duration of stay in the recovery room or OAA/S sedation score after extubation. No patients in either group experienced intraoperative awareness, and no significant postoperative adverse reactions were observed. Conclusion: Compared with propofol, remifentanil besylate provides safe and effective induction and maintenance of anesthesia for LC, with rapid and complete effects and less impact on the cardiovascular system.

参考文献:

[1] OH J,PARK S Y,LEE S Y,et al.Determination of the 95% effective dose of remimazolam to achieve loss of consciousness during anesthesia induction in different age groups[J].Korean J Anesthesiol,2022,75(6):510-517.
[2] 马根山,陈小红,曹汉忠.瑞马唑仑在老年肥胖患者无痛胃镜检查中的应用效果[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2022,38(10):1057-1060.
[3] 陈丽红,谢惠琳,黄霞,等.观察者警觉/镇静评定评分与脑电双频谱指数监测在全麻诱导期丙泊酚滴定给药中的相关性[J].南方医科大学学报,2025,45(1):52-58.
[4] HEMPHILL S,MCMENAMIN L,BELLAMY M C,et al.Propofol infusion syndrome:a structured literature review and analysis of published case reports[J].Br J Anaesth,2019,122(4):448-459.
[5] CANNON M L,GLAZIER S S,BAUMAN L A.Metabolic acidosis,rhabdomyolysis,and cardiovascular collapse after prolonged propofol infusion[J].J Neurosurg,2001,95(6):1053-1056.
[6] CHAE D,KIM H C,SONG Y,et al.Pharmacodynamic analysis of intravenous bolus remimazolam for loss of consciousness in patients undergoing general anaesthesia:a randomised,prospective,double-blind study[J].Br J Anaesth,2022,129(1):49-57.
[7] 徐海,朱婷婷,周红梅.丙泊酚及不同剂量瑞马唑仑对舒芬太尼抑制老年患者气管插管反应半数有效剂量的影响[J].中国现代医生,2024,62(8):79-82,92.
[8] 马紫元.瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚用于无痛胃肠镜检查的有效性和安全性比较[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古医科大学,2022.
[9] 杨益锋,范智东.麻醉深度监测指标在围手术期麻醉中的应用研究进展[J].现代医药卫生,2021,37(12):2026-2029.
[10] 梅芸.脑电双频指数与听觉诱发电位指数在麻醉深度监测中的应用[J].现代电生理学杂志,2025,32(1):25-28.
[11] 汪威廉,龚洁,吴晓琴,等.瑞马唑仑复合瑞芬太尼用于支撑喉镜下声带手术的效果[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2023,39(12):1270-1275.
[12] PEREIRA E M,MORAES V R,GAYA DA COSTA M,et al.Remimazolam vs.propofol for general anaesthesia in elderly patients:a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis[J].Eur J Anaesthesiol,2024,41(10):738-748.
[13] HUNG K C,WANG W T,LIU W C,et al.Comparing subjective quality of recovery between remimazolam-and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia for surgical procedures:a meta-analysis[J].Syst Rev,2024,13(1):235.
[14] PENG X,LIU C,ZHU Y,et al.Hemodynamic influences of remimazolam versus propofol during the induction period of general anesthesia:a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J].Pain Physician,2023,26(7):E761-E733.

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录
您是第 1055836 位访问者


 ©《现代医学》编辑部
联系电话:025-83272481;83272479
电子邮件: xdyx@pub.seu.edu.cn

本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626

苏ICP备09058541