Objective: To observe the clinical effect of remifentanil combined with rimazolen benzenesulfonate for total intravenous anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC). Methods: Sixty patients who underwent LC in our hospital from June 2023 to February 2024 were enrolled, including 26 males and 34 females, aged 23-73 years, with body mass index(BMI) 20.2-26.5 kg·m-2, and the American Society of anesthesiologists(ASA) grade Ⅰ or Ⅱ. They were randomly assigned to remifentanil besylate group(group R, n=30) or propofol group(group B, n=30). Group B received intravenous infusion of 1% propofol at a rate of 200 mL·h-1, while group R received intravenous infusion of 0.15% remifentanil besylate at a rate of 200 mL·h-1 for anesthesia induction. After successful tracheal intubation, both groups of patients were administered remifentanil at a rate of 6-8 μg·(kg·h)-1. Group B received intravenous infusion of propofol at a rate of 3-4 mg·(kg·h)-1, while group R received continuous infusion of remifentanil besylate at a rate of 1 mg·(kg·h)-1, maintaining a bispectral index(BIS) value between 40 and 60. Rocuronium bromide was added at a rate of 0.2 mg·kg-1 according to the surgical duration. The BIS, heart rate(HR), and mean arterial pressure(MAP) data of two groups were recorded before induction(T0), immediately after induction(T1), immediately after endotracheal intubation(T2), before surgery(T3), 30 min after surgery(T4), and at the end of surgery(T5). The postoperative time of tracheal tube removal, the observer's assessment of alertness/sedation scale(OAA/S) at 15 min after tracheal tube removal, the duration of stay in the post anesthesia care unit(PACU) of the two groups were observed and recorded, and the adverse reactions such as nausea, vomiting, and intraoperative awareness were recorded. The patients were followed up for 3 d after surgery to observe the occurrence of postoperative delirium. Results: Both groups rapidly achieved the preset BIS value during induction, and the BIS value remained stable during anesthesia. Although the decrease in BIS value was more significant in group B than in group R, there was no significant difference in induction time between the two groups(t=1.124, P>0.05). During the operation, the number of patients who used the cardiovascular active drug epinephrine was significantly higher in group B than in group R(χ2=7.612, P<0.05). The postoperative extubation time of group B patients was shorter than that of group R(t=5.22, P<0.05). However, there were no significant differences in the duration of stay in the recovery room or OAA/S sedation score after extubation. No patients in either group experienced intraoperative awareness, and no significant postoperative adverse reactions were observed. Conclusion: Compared with propofol, remifentanil besylate provides safe and effective induction and maintenance of anesthesia for LC, with rapid and complete effects and less impact on the cardiovascular system. |
[1] OH J,PARK S Y,LEE S Y,et al.Determination of the 95% effective dose of remimazolam to achieve loss of consciousness during anesthesia induction in different age groups[J].Korean J Anesthesiol,2022,75(6):510-517.
[2] 马根山,陈小红,曹汉忠.瑞马唑仑在老年肥胖患者无痛胃镜检查中的应用效果[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2022,38(10):1057-1060.
[3] 陈丽红,谢惠琳,黄霞,等.观察者警觉/镇静评定评分与脑电双频谱指数监测在全麻诱导期丙泊酚滴定给药中的相关性[J].南方医科大学学报,2025,45(1):52-58.
[4] HEMPHILL S,MCMENAMIN L,BELLAMY M C,et al.Propofol infusion syndrome:a structured literature review and analysis of published case reports[J].Br J Anaesth,2019,122(4):448-459.
[5] CANNON M L,GLAZIER S S,BAUMAN L A.Metabolic acidosis,rhabdomyolysis,and cardiovascular collapse after prolonged propofol infusion[J].J Neurosurg,2001,95(6):1053-1056.
[6] CHAE D,KIM H C,SONG Y,et al.Pharmacodynamic analysis of intravenous bolus remimazolam for loss of consciousness in patients undergoing general anaesthesia:a randomised,prospective,double-blind study[J].Br J Anaesth,2022,129(1):49-57.
[7] 徐海,朱婷婷,周红梅.丙泊酚及不同剂量瑞马唑仑对舒芬太尼抑制老年患者气管插管反应半数有效剂量的影响[J].中国现代医生,2024,62(8):79-82,92.
[8] 马紫元.瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚用于无痛胃肠镜检查的有效性和安全性比较[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古医科大学,2022.
[9] 杨益锋,范智东.麻醉深度监测指标在围手术期麻醉中的应用研究进展[J].现代医药卫生,2021,37(12):2026-2029.
[10] 梅芸.脑电双频指数与听觉诱发电位指数在麻醉深度监测中的应用[J].现代电生理学杂志,2025,32(1):25-28.
[11] 汪威廉,龚洁,吴晓琴,等.瑞马唑仑复合瑞芬太尼用于支撑喉镜下声带手术的效果[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2023,39(12):1270-1275.
[12] PEREIRA E M,MORAES V R,GAYA DA COSTA M,et al.Remimazolam vs.propofol for general anaesthesia in elderly patients:a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis[J].Eur J Anaesthesiol,2024,41(10):738-748.
[13] HUNG K C,WANG W T,LIU W C,et al.Comparing subjective quality of recovery between remimazolam-and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia for surgical procedures:a meta-analysis[J].Syst Rev,2024,13(1):235.
[14] PENG X,LIU C,ZHU Y,et al.Hemodynamic influences of remimazolam versus propofol during the induction period of general anesthesia:a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J].Pain Physician,2023,26(7):E761-E733. |