网站首页期刊介绍通知公告编 委 会投稿须知电子期刊广告合作联系我们
最新消息:
胶质瘤手术患者衰弱、自我同情与生活质量的相关性分析
作者:金醒醒  邓娟  陈媛  齐玉娟  刘佳  蒋紫娟 
单位:南京医科大学附属脑科医院 神经外科, 江苏 南京 210029
关键词:胶质瘤 生活质量 衰弱 自我同情 相关性 
分类号:R739.4
出版年·卷·期(页码):2025·53·第十一期(1763-1769)
摘要:

目的: 探究胶质瘤手术患者衰弱、自我同情与生活质量的相关性。方法: 采取便利抽样法,选取2023年5月至2024年10月于本院接受手术治疗的164例胶质瘤患者。术后出院前1 d采用一般资料调查问卷收集患者基线人口学资料及疾病治疗相关资料,采用中文版格列宁根衰弱指标量表(GFI)评估衰弱情况,以中文版自悯量表(SCS)评估自我同情水平。术后随访6个月,采用中文版癌症患者生命质量测定量表(FACT-G)评估生活质量。应用Pearson相关性分析衰弱、自我同情与胶质瘤手术患者生活质量的相关性,采用多元线性回归分析生活质量的影响因素。结果: 胶质瘤手术患者FACT-G总分为(78.08±12.85)分,SCS总分为(87.82±8.72)分,GFI总分为(5.52±1.83)分。Pearson相关性分析显示,GFI得分与FACT-G得分呈负相关(r=-0.534,P<0.01),SCS得分与FACT-G得分呈正相关(r=0.507,P<0.01)。单因素分析显示,年龄≤60岁、大专及以上文化程度、肿瘤直径≤4 cm、病理分级为低级别、手术方式为全切、术前卡氏功能状态(KPS)评分>70分的胶质瘤手术患者FACT-G得分较高(P<0.05)。多元线性回归分析显示,年龄>60岁、GFI得分升高对胶质瘤手术患者生活质量具有负向预测作用,全切手术、术前KPS评分>70分、SCS得分升高具有正向预测作用(P<0.05)。结论: 胶质瘤手术患者生活质量处于中等水平,其中自我同情水平与生活质量水平成显著正相关,衰弱程度与生活质量水平成负相关。年龄、手术方式、术前KPS评分、GFI及SCS得分均是影响胶质瘤手术患者生活质量的重要因素。

Objective: To explore the correlation between frailty, self-compassion and quality of life in patients with glioma surgery. Methods: A total of 164 patients with glioma who underwent surgical treatment at our hospital from May 2023 to Oct. 2024 were selected by convenience sampling method. Baseline demographic data and treatment-related data were collected on the day before discharge using a general information questionnaire. The Chinese version of Groningen frailty indicator(GFI) and the Chinese version of self-compassion scale(SCS) were used to assess frailty status and self-compassion level, respectively. After 6 month follow-up, quality of life was evaluated using the Chinese version of functional assessment of cancer therapy-general(FACT-G). Pearson correlation analysis was used to examine the correlation between frailty, self-compassion and quality of life in patients undergoing glioma surgery. Multiple linear regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of quality of life. Results: The total FACT-G score was 78.08±12.85, the total SCS score was 87.82±8.72, and the total GFI score was 5.52±1.83. Pearson correlation analysis showed that the GFI score was negatively correlated with the FACT-G score(r=-0.534,P<0.01), whereas the SCS score was positively correlated with the FACT-G score(r=0.507,P<0.01). Univariate analysis showed that glioma-surgery patients who were ≤60 years, had a college degree or higher, presented with a tumor diameter ≤4 cm, low-grade pathology, gross-total resection, and a preoperative Karnofsky performance status(KPS) score >70 had significantly higher FACT-G scores(P<0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that age >60 years and increased GFI score had negative predictive effects on quality of life in patients undergoing glioma surgery, while gross-total resection, preoperative KPS score >70, and increased SCS score had positive predictive effects(P<0.05). Conclusion: The quality of life of patients undergoing glioma surgery is moderate. Self-compassion is positively associated with quality of life, whereas frailty is negatively associated. Age, surgical method, preoperative KPS, GFI and SCS scores are all important factors affecting the quality of life of patients undergoing glioma surgery.

参考文献:

[1] 李晓蓉,王宏坤,卞伟,等.胶质瘤新型分子标志物的研究进展[J].中国医药导报,2023,20(25):62-65.
[2] WASSEF C E,CAIN S A,DRUMMOND K J.Changing practice to improve quality of life in glioma[J].J Neurosurg,2024,141(5):1270-1280.
[3] STÅHL P,HENOCH I,SMITS A,et al.Quality of life in patients with glioblastoma and their relatives[J].Acta Neurol Scand,2022,146(1):82-91.
[4] 陈李娜,高云静.老年冠心病患者PCI术后衰弱状态与功能恢复的相关性分析[J].现代医学,2025,53(4):647-653.
[5] 刘月,刘扣英,孟爱凤,等.肺癌患者自我同情及相关因素[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2023,37(2):110-115.
[6] 张丽丽,韩明强,崔占斌,等.中文版FACT-G量表在肿瘤患者生命质量评价中的适用性研究[J].中国卫生统计,2022,39(2):243-245.
[7] 陈菲菲,庞永慧,茅乃权,等.老年肺癌患者衰弱现状及其与生活质量的相关程度研究[J].现代临床护理,2021,20(6):6-11.
[8] 林晓非,蒋琼,周春雪,等.血液科恶性肿瘤患者自悯水平调查及其影响因素分析[J].中华现代护理杂志,2025,31(6):818-823.
[9] 达一淼,岳莲莲,陶亭亭,等.胃肠癌患者术后生命质量现状及与焦虑、抑郁的相关性分析[J].实用预防医学,2022,29(3):367-370.
[10] 李明妍,王睿哲,易莹莹,等.癌症病人衰弱评估工具的研究进展[J].护理研究,2024,38(15):2723-2727.
[11] CHITALU P,TSUI A,SEARLE S D,et al.Life-space,frailty,and health-related quality of life[J].BMC Geriatr,2022,22(1):646.
[12] 王丹蕾,张蓉,吴琪,等.基于Tilburg衰弱评估量表评价的老年慢性心力衰竭合并衰弱的危险因素探讨及其对患者生活质量和预后的影响[J].现代生物医学进展,2023,23(16):3077-3082.
[13] LAI J C,SHUI A M,DUARTE-ROJO A,et al.Association of frailty with health-related quality of life in liver transplant recipients[J].JAMA Surg,2023,158(2):130-138.
[14] 任雅钰,赵海平.癌症患者自我同情的研究进展[J].解放军护理杂志,2021,38(6):58-61.
[15] PAUCSIK M,NARDELLI C,BORTOLON C,et al.Self-compassion and emotion regulation:testing a mediation model[J].Cogn Emot,2023,37(1):49-61.
[16] SKINNER C M,KUIJER R G.Self-compassion and health-related quality of life in individuals with endometriosis[J].Psychol Health,2025,40(9):1479-1496.
[17] 宋金铭.肺癌患者领悟社会支持、自我同情与生活质量的相关性研究[D].延吉:延边大学,2022.
[18] 李若宁,吕利明,葛洪霞,等.癌症患者自我同情评估及干预方法的研究进展[J].中华现代护理杂志,2022,28(15):2095-2100.
[19] PYYKKÖ J E,AYDIN Ö,GERDES V E A,et al.Psychological functioning and well-being before and after bariatric surgery; what is the benefit of being self-compassionate[J].Br J Health Psychol,2022,27(1):96-115.
[20] 倪鸣,杨弋弋,叶永生,等.宫颈癌患者术后创伤后成长状况及影响因素分析[J].癌症进展,2024,22(24):2737-2740.

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录
您是第 1055836 位访问者


 ©《现代医学》编辑部
联系电话:025-83272481;83272479
电子邮件: xdyx@pub.seu.edu.cn

本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626

苏ICP备09058541