网站首页期刊介绍通知公告编 委 会投稿须知电子期刊广告合作联系我们
最新消息:
中青年2型糖尿病患者出院后自我管理轨迹变化与影响因素分析
作者:袁霄1  张婧秋2  陈春光1 
单位:1. 江苏省人民医院宿迁医院 内分泌科, 江苏 宿迁 223800;
2. 江苏省人民医院宿迁医院 护理部, 江苏 宿迁 223800
关键词:中青年 2型糖尿病 自我管理 影响因素 轨迹 纵向研究 
分类号:R587.1
出版年·卷·期(页码):2025·53·第十期(1562-1568)
摘要:

目的:探讨中青年2型糖尿病患者出院后自我管理轨迹变化,并分析其潜在类别和影响因素。方法:采用纵向研究设计,纳入2023年6月至2024年6月在我院就诊的180例中青年2型糖尿病患者为研究对象,随访调查患者出院后1年内自我管理情况。采用潜变量增长混合模型(LGMM)分析自我管理变化轨迹及类别,根据收集的临床资料,采用Logistic回归分析潜在类别的影响因素。结果:180例患者中最终168例患者完成研究。出院后中青年2型糖尿病患者自我管理行为评分随出院时间延长呈下降趋势。经LGMM分析,最终选择保留3个潜在类别作为最优模型,分别为高水平上升组(40例、占23.81%)、中水平维持组(59例、占35.12%)、低水平下降组(69例、占41.07%)。3个轨迹组年龄、文化程度、家庭人均月收入、合并症、居住方式、疾病知识得分及家庭关怀度指数比较,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);Logistic回归分析显示,以低水平下降组为对照,年龄、疾病知识得分、家庭人均月收入、合并症、家庭关怀度指数为中水平维持的影响因素;以中水平维持组为对照,疾病知识得分、家庭人均月收入为高水平上升的影响因素(P<0.05)。结论:中青年2型糖尿病患者出院后自我管理行为评分随院外时间延长呈下降趋势,有高水平上升、中水平维持、低水平下降3种轨迹趋势,其中年龄、疾病知识得分、家庭人均月收入、合并症、家庭关怀度指数为中水平维持的影响因素,疾病知识得分、家庭人均月收入为高水平上升的影响因素,临床可针对上述因素制定针对性措施提高患者自我管理行为水平。

Objective: To investigate the trajectory changes of self-management in young and middle-aged patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus after discharge and analyze their latent classes and influencing factors. Methods: Using a longitudinal study design, 180 young and middle-aged patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated in our hospital from June 2023 to June 2024 were included as study subjects. Follow-up surveys were conducted on patients' self-management status within one year after discharge. Latent Growth Mixture Model(LGMM) was used to analyze self-management trajectory changes and classes. Based on collected clinical data, Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze influencing factors of latent classes. Results: Among 180 patients, 168 patients ultimately completed the study. Self-management scores of young and middle-aged patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus showed a declining trend with prolonged time after discharge. Through LGMM analysis, three latent classes were finally selected and retained as the optimal model: high-level rising group(40 cases, 23.81%), medium-level maintaining group(59 cases, 35.12%), and low-level declining group(69 cases, 41.07%). Significant differences were found among the three trajectory groups in age, education level, monthly family income per capita, comorbidities, living arrangements, disease knowledge scores, and family care index(all P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that, with the low-level declining group as reference, age, disease knowledge scores, monthly family income per capita, comorbidities, and family care index were influencing factors for medium-level maintenance; with the medium-level maintaining group as reference, disease knowledge scores and monthly family income per capita were influencing factors for high-level rising(P<0.05). Conclusion: Self-management behavior in young and middle-aged patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus shows a declining trend with prolonged time outside the hospital after discharge, presenting three trajectory patterns: high-level rising, medium-level maintaining, and low-level declining. Among these, age, disease knowledge scores, monthly family income per capita, comorbidities, and family care index are influencing factors for medium-level maintenance, while disease knowledge scores and monthly family income per capita are influencing factors for high-level rising. Targeted measures can be developed clinically based on the above factors to improve patients' self-management behavior.

参考文献:

[1] 王硕,叶青,徐斐,等.南京市40~69岁社区居民糖尿病前期流行现状及影响因素分析[J].现代医学,2025,53(3):392-399.
[2] 中国老年2型糖尿病防治临床指南编写组,中国老年医学学会老年内分泌代谢分会,中国老年保健医学研究会老年内分泌与代谢分会,等.中国老年2型糖尿病防治临床指南(2022年版)[J].中华内科杂志,2022,61(1):12-50.
[3] 蔡佩萱,梁怡青,王晶晶,等.中青年2型糖尿病患者饮食行为依从性变化轨迹及影响因素分析[J].中华护理杂志,2024,59(13):1592-1599.
[4] 巩秋红,李光伟.控制空腹血糖在糖化血红蛋白水平和血糖管理中的重要作用[J].中国实用内科杂志,2023,43(5):411-415.
[5] ZHANG Y,YANG Y,HUANG Q,et al.The effectiveness of lifestyle interventions for diabetes remission on patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Worldviews Evid Based Nurs,2023,20(1):64-78.
[6] BUTAYEVA J,RATAN Z A,DOWNIE S,et al.The impact of health literacy interventions on glycemic control and self-management outcomes among type 2 diabetes mellitus:a systematic review[J].J Diabetes,2023,15(9):724-735.
[7] 丁慧敏,戴莉敏,蔡冬青,等.糖尿病前期患者自我管理潜在剖面分析及影响因素研究[J].中华护理杂志,2024,59(9):1057-1064.
[8] 朱兰,潘志刚,沈福来.社区老年2型糖尿病患者自我管理与家庭支持现况的质性研究[J].中华全科医师杂志,2024,23(2):126-131.
[9] 中华医学会糖尿病学分会.中国2型糖尿病防治指南(2020年版)(上)[J].中国实用内科杂志,2021,41(8):668-695.
[10] 王影,朱振华,张蕊馨,等.乳腺癌病人社交焦虑和病耻感在家庭关怀度与孤独感间的中介作用[J].护理研究,2024,38(4):571-576.
[11] 王海棠,王学智,李莉,等.糖尿病自我管理行为量表应用于社区糖尿病患者自我管理中的信度与效度研究[J].中国初级卫生保健,2022,36(4):34-37.
[12] 王瑞,赵要松.修订后的糖尿病知识测评问卷的汉化及信效度研究[J].河南医学研究,2023,32(21):3865-3869.
[13] KUO H J,HUANG Y C,GARCÍA A A.An integrative review of fatigue in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus:implications for self-management and quality of life[J].J Clin Nurs,2022,31(11-12):1409-1427.
[14] 宋威,梁琳琅,冯聪.2型糖尿病患者饮食依从性预测模型的建立及评价[J].现代医学,2025,53(4):622-628.
[15] 李凤,高英丽,徐倩,等.中青年2型糖尿病病人风险感知与自我管理水平的相关性研究[J].护理研究,2023,37(4):590-595.
[16] O'CONNOR S,BLAIS C,MÉSIDOR M,et al.Great diversity in the utilization and reporting of latent growth modeling approaches in type 2 diabetes:a literature review[J].Heliyon,2022,8(9):e10493.
[17] AMOUZEGAR A,HONARVAR M,MASOUMI S,et al.Trajectory patterns of metabolic syndrome severity score and risk of type 2 diabetes[J].J Transl Med,2023,21(1):750.
[18] 王斐,丁雯,刘娟,等.老年慢性心力衰竭患者自我管理轨迹及其影响因素分析[J].中国护理管理,2024,24(9):1308-1313.
[19] WANG C,LANG J,XUAN L,et al.The effect of health literacy and self-management efficacy on the health-related quality of life of hypertensive patients in a western rural area of China:a cross-sectional study[J].Int J Equity Health,2017,16(1):58.
[20] 张亚军.脑卒中患者家庭关怀、恐惧疾病进展、慢病资源利用与自我管理行为的相关性研究[D].天津:天津中医药大学,2023.
[21] 赵雨曦,吕军,毛淋淇,等.上海市某社区2型糖尿病患者风险认知与行为的关系分析[J].医学与社会,2021,34(11):1-5.

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录
您是第 1008139 位访问者


 ©《现代医学》编辑部
联系电话:025-83272481;83272479
电子邮件: xdyx@pub.seu.edu.cn

本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626

苏ICP备09058541