创伤性脑损伤患者谵妄发生的预测因素及预防干预策略 |
作者:汤淼1 丁靓2 俞岩1 何洁1 李令之1 |
单位:1. 淮安市第二人民医院 急诊医学科, 江苏 淮安 223001; 2. 淮安市第二人民医院 中心手术室, 江苏 淮安 223001 |
关键词:创伤性脑损伤 谵妄 影响因素 预测模型 神经检查频率 |
分类号:R651.15 |
|
出版年·卷·期(页码):2025·53·第八期(1278-1283) |
摘要:
|
目的:探究创伤性脑损伤患者谵妄发生的预测因素,提出预防干预策略。方法: 回顾性分析2023年6月至2025年1月于我院接受治疗的216例创伤性脑损伤患者临床资料,依据住院期间是否发生谵妄分为谵妄组与非谵妄组。比较两组临床资料,采用Logistic回归分析创伤性脑损伤患者发生谵妄的影响因素,构建回归预测模型并对模型进行验证及效能评价。结果:216例创伤性脑损伤患者中有57例发生谵妄,发生率为26.39%。两组患者在年龄、吸烟史、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)水平、血清白蛋白水平、血清钾水平、神经检查频率、入院损伤严重程度评分(ISS)、脑室内出血等方面,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Logistic回归分析显示,IL-6、入院ISS≥20分、脑室内出血为创伤性脑损伤病人发生谵妄的独立危险因素,每4 h神经检查为保护因素(P<0.05)。依据上述独立影响因素建立回归预测模型,受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线预测模型对创伤性脑损伤患者发生谵妄的预测曲线下面积(AUC)为0.929,预测敏感度、特异度分别为82.46%、89.31%。H-L检验提示预测模型一致性良好(P>0.05)。结论:创伤性脑损伤病人发生谵妄概率仍较高,IL-6、入院ISS、脑室内出血、神经检查频率是其重要影响因素,临床可据此制定预防干预策略,以降低谵妄发生率。 |
Objective: To investigate predictive factors for delirium in patients with traumatic brain injury(TBI) and propose preventive intervention strategies. Methods: Clinical data of 216 TBI patients treated at our hospital from June 2023 to January 2025 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into delirium and non-delirium groups based on the occurrence of delirium during hospitalization. Clinical data were compared between the groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors influencing delirium occurrence in TBI patients,and a regression prediction model was constructed,validated and evaluated for performance. Results: Among 216 TBI patients,57 developed delirium,with an incidence of 26.39%. Statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in age,smoking history,interleukin-6(IL-6) levels,serum albumin levels,serum potassium levels,neurological check frequency,admission Injury Severity Score(ISS),and intraventricular hemorrhage(P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that IL-6,admission ISS≥20,and intraventricular hemorrhage were independent risk factors for delirium in TBI patients,while 4-hourly neurological checks served as a protective factor(P<0.05). A regression prediction model was established based on these independent factors. The receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve showed an area under the curve(AUC) of 0.929 for predicting delirium,with sensitivity and specificity of 82.46% and 89.31%,respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated that the model had a good consistency(P>0.05). Conclusion: The incidence of delirium remains high in TBI patients. IL-6,admission ISS,intraventricular hemorrhage,and neurological check frequency are significant influencing factors. Clinical preventive intervention strategies can be developed based on these factors to reduce delirium occurrence. |
参考文献:
|
[1] 李佳雨, 刘素云, 莫景书, 等.轻度创伤性颅脑损伤患者谵妄发生情况及其影响因素分析[J].创伤外科杂志, 2024, 26(7):512-516. [2] 吕婧, 何青青, 郝铮.神经外科术后谵妄的危险因素[J].临床与病理杂志, 2021, 41(4):960-964. [3] JEONG I S, CHO M K.Factors affecting delirium in ICU patients[J].Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2023, 20(10):5889. [4] 王雷原, 胡小义, 王迪, 等.老年患者术前脑损伤程度与术后谵妄的关系:基于脑损伤标志物的潜在类别分析[J].中华麻醉学杂志, 2024, 44(3):267-271. [5] 文佳, 董芳辉, 张亚娟, 等.ICU成年患者谵妄分型预防护理方案内容框架的构建[J].重庆医学, 2024, 53(3):466-471. [6] 郎力键, 杨春, 冯军峰, 等.中国老年颅脑创伤患者基本特征的初步探讨[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2021, 37(5):485-489. [7] CAO P, JIA Z Y, ZHENG T, et al.Correlation of preoperative inflammatory factors and emotional disorders with postoperative delirium in patients with craniocerebral trauma[J].World J Psychiatry, 2024, 14(7):1043-1052. [8] WILSON L D, MAIGA A W, LOMBARDO S, et al.Prevalence and risk factors for intensive care unit delirium after traumatic brain injury:a retrospective cohort study[J].Neurocrit Care, 2023, 38(3):752-760. [9] 李雪梅, 王欣琦, 徐励, 等.脑肿瘤术后患者ICU谵妄风险预测模型的构建及验证[J].中华现代护理杂志, 2022, 28(29):3991-3997. [10] JIA S, YANG H, HUANG F, et al.Systemic inflammation, neuroinflammation and perioperative neurocognitive disorders[J].Inflamm Res, 2023, 72(9):1895-1907. [11] 付海鑫.神经变性疾病与神经炎症:小胶质细胞和星形胶质细胞的作用[J].中风与神经疾病杂志, 2023, 40(9):859-864. [12] NOAH A M, ALMGHAIRBI D, EVLEY R, et al.Preoperative inflammatory mediators and postoperative delirium:systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Br J Anaesth, 2021, 127(3):424-434. [13] KUHLMANN J, ALHAMMADI E, MEVISSEN A, et al.Delirium and sleep disturbances-a narrative review[J].Z Gerontol Geriatr, 2023, 56(7):539-544. [14] 陈丽玲, 康月明, 严胜男, 等.神经外科患者术后谵妄发生率及危险因素的Meta分析[J].中国护理管理, 2024, 24(6):892-897. [15] FONSECA R A, CANAS M, DIAZ L, et al.Prolonged hourly neurological examinations are associated with increased delirium and no discernible benefit in mild/moderate geriatric traumatic brain injury[J].J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2024, 97(1):105-111. [16] CHOTAI S, CHEN J W, TURER R, et al.Neurological examination frequency and time-to-delirium after traumatic brain injury[J].Neurosurgery, 2023, 93(6):1425-1431. [17] 潘亚强, 伍泽民.急诊脑外伤患者谵妄的影响因素及其风险预测模型的构建[J].中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志, 2024, 19(4):454-458. [18] 刘迎锋, 赵自育, 张伟.高血压脑室出血引起认知功能障碍危险因素分析[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志, 2020, 46(11):656-659. [19] 陈小刚, 汪正伟.右美托咪定对老年结直肠癌患者术后认知功能及血浆miR-206、BDNF水平的影响[J].东南大学学报(医学版), 2021, 40(4):442-449. [20] SHIN H J, WOO NAM S, KIM H, et al.Postoperative delirium after Dexmedetomidine versus Propofol sedation in healthy older adults undergoing orthopedic lower limb surgery with spinal anesthesia:a randomized controlled trial[J].Anesthesiology, 2023, 138(2):164-171. |
服务与反馈:
|
【文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏】
|
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录 |
|
|
©《现代医学》编辑部
联系电话:025-83272481;83272479
电子邮件: xdyx@pub.seu.edu.cn
本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626
苏ICP备09058541
|
|