Objective: To explore the influencing factors of postpartum hemorrhage in patients with scar uterus, and to establish a prediction model. Methods: 80 patients with scarred uterus with postpartum hemorrhage from March 2022 to March 2024 were retrospectively selected as the postpartum hemorrhage group, and 160 patients with scarred uterus without postpartum hemorrhage were selected as the group without postpartum hemorrhage during the same period. Clinical data of patients with scarred uterus were collected, and the influencing factors of postpartum hemorrhage in patients with scarred uterus were analyzed by Logistic regression. Regression prediction model was built accordingly, and receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve, calibration curve were drawn to evaluate the prediction efficiency, calibration degree of the model. Results: Logistic regression analysis showed placenta accreta(OR=26.962, 95%CI 5.548-131.031, P<0.001), inferior anterior uterine wall muscle thickness(OR=0.087, 95%CI 0.030-0.255, P<0.001), prenatal fibrinogen(FIB)(OR=0.241, 95%CI 0.108-0.538,P=0.001), prenatal transforming growth foctor-β1(TGF-β1)(OR=0.908, 95%CI 0.878-0.938, P<0.001), newborn body mass(OR=3.270, 95%CI 1.545-6.925, P=0.002) were the influencing factors of postpartum hemorrhage in patients with scarred uterus. Regression prediction model was constructed according to the above influencing factors. The ROC curve found that the area under curve(AUC) of this model to predict postpartum hemorrhage in patients with scarred uterus was 0.949, and calibration curve show that the nomogram prediction model of postpartum hemorrhage in patients with scarred uterus had high calibration degree. Conclusion: Placenta implantation, muscular thickness of inferior anterior uterine wall, prenatal FIB level, prenatal TGF-β1 level and newborn body mass can all affect the occurrence of postpartum hemorrhage in patients with scarred uterus. The regression prediction model constructed on this basis has good predictive value, and can provide references for the formulation of clinical preventive strategies to reduce the risk of postpartum hemorrhage. |
[1] MADHURI M S,JHA N,PAMPAPATI V,et al.Fetomaternal outcome of scarred uterine rupture compared with primary uterine rupture:a retrospective cohort study[J].J Perinat Med,2023,51(8):1067-1073.
[2] WANG S,HU Q,LIAO H,et al.Perinatal outcomes of pregnancy in women with scarred uteri[J].Int J Womens Health,2023,15:1453-1465.
[3] 曹丽丽.2019—2023年无锡市梁溪区高危妊娠孕产妇流行病学特征分析[J].东南大学学报(医学版),2024,43(4):604-609.
[4] 黄水玉,陈月秋.瘢痕子宫产妇阴道试产失败影响因素及妊娠结局分析[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2023,31(11):2674-2678.
[5] 于莹,沈汝冈,刘凯波,等.北京市6194例阴道分娩产后出血影响因素分析[J].中国妇幼健康研究,2023,34(10):53-59.
[6] 肖淑,余丽金,孙楠,等.妊娠期糖尿病患者发生产后出血的多因素分析[J].河北医学,2023,29(6):995-1000.
[7] 中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组.产后出血预防与处理指南(2014)[J].中华妇产科杂志,2014,49(9):641-646.
[8] 高永祥,张晋昕.Logistic回归分析的样本量确定[J].循证医学,2018,18(2):122-124.
[9] MURJI A,SANDERS A P,MONTEIRO I,et al.Cesarean scar defects and abnormal uterine bleeding:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Fertil Steril,2022,118(4):758-766.
[10] 白晶,王倩,毛萌,等.基于发病机制及病理变化治疗剖宫产瘢痕缺损新术式疗效分析[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2023,39(6):652-655.
[11] 吴茜子,李伟,艾国,等.剖宫产术后瘢痕子宫妊娠子宫下段不完全性破裂的临床分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,2023,39(3):221-226.
[12] CHEN B,ZHANG L,WANG D,et al.Nomogram to predict postpartum hemorrhage in cesarean delivery for women with scarred uterus:a retrospective cohort study in China[J].J Obstet Gynaecol Res,2020,46(9):1772-1782.
[13] 劳永霞,伍伶俐,萧志辉.瘢痕子宫患者产后出血的危险因素及D-二聚体的预测价值分析[J].中国性科学,2022,31(6):50-53.
[14] 陈练,赵扬玉.阴道分娩后胎盘因素性产后出血的处理与思考[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2024,40(4):399-402.
[15] 胡慧颖,丁永霞.瘢痕子宫再妊娠孕妇子宫肌层厚度与不良妊娠结局关系[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2024,32(2):417-420,426,480.
[16] 金永楠,李仪,胡妙芳,等.孕晚期血清纤维蛋白原、抗凝血酶-Ⅲ水平与妊娠期糖尿病产妇产后出血的相关性[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2021,31(17):2093-2096.
[17] 杨杰,郭丽宁,钟梅.妊娠期高血压患者血清TGF-β1、PLGF、PAI-1水平与病情程度及妊娠结局的关系[J].川北医学院学报,2024,39(5):688-691.
[18] 龙驭云,沈立平,杨月华,等.二孩剖宫产产后出血危险因素及与宫内节育器相关性[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2023,31(1):112-116. |