网站首页期刊介绍通知公告编 委 会投稿须知电子期刊广告合作联系我们
最新消息:
肺癌终末期患者死亡态度、恐惧疾病进展以及生命质量之间的关系研究
作者:徐晋君  葛春娇  莫永静 
单位:南京医科大学附属淮安第一医院 肿瘤内科, 江苏 淮安 223300
关键词:肺癌|终末期|恐惧疾病进展|死亡态度|生命质量 
分类号:R734.2
出版年·卷·期(页码):2025·53·第四期(653-659)
摘要:

目的: 明确肺癌终末期患者死亡态度、恐惧疾病进展以及生命质量之间的关系,寻找提升患者生命质量的有效干预方式。方法: 回顾性分析2021年6月至2024年5月在南京医科大学附属淮安第一医院肿瘤内科住院治疗的157例肺癌终末期患者病例资料,采集患者一般资料、中文版死亡态度描绘量表、恐惧疾病进展简化量表以及中文版癌症患者生命质量测定量表评分情况,应用Pearson相关系数明确患者死亡态度、恐惧疾病进展以及生命质量之间的相关性。建立结构方程模型,检验死亡态度在恐惧疾病进展与生命质量间的中介作用。结果: 肺癌终末期患者趋近接受为(30.31±4.62)分、自然接受为(18.06±3.35)分、逃离接受为(17.82±2.52)分、死亡恐惧为(26.09±3.19)分、死亡逃避为(14.94±2.63)分;恐惧疾病进展总分为(37.99±5.37)分,肺癌终末期患者生命质量总分为(65.69±11.30)分。分层分析显示:女性自然接受维度得分高于男性;年龄<60岁患者多维度得分更高;不同学历患者在自然接受、逃离接受、死亡恐惧、死亡逃避、恐惧疾病进展总分维度得分差异有统计学意义;不同月人均收入患者在死亡逃避、生存质量总分维度得分差异有统计学意义;不同医疗支付类型患者在逃离接受、死亡逃避维度得分差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。趋近接受与恐惧疾病进展呈负相关(P<0.05),与生命质量呈正相关(P<0.05);逃离接受、死亡恐惧以及死亡逃避与恐惧疾病进展呈正相关(P<0.05),与生命质量呈负相关(P<0.05);恐惧疾病进展与生命质量负相关(P<0.05);中介效应分析结果显示,死亡态度与恐惧疾病进展均对生命质量有直接效应(P<0.05),且疾病恐惧进展还通过死亡态度间接影响患者生命质量(P<0.05),中介效应值为34.70%。结论: 肺癌终末期患者生命质量评分普遍偏低,死亡态度和恐惧疾病进展与患者生命质量存在密切的联系。恐惧疾病进展可直接预测患者生命质量,且还可通过死亡态度间接预测患者生命质量,临床应采取相应干预措施改善患者死亡态度及恐惧疾病进展,以提高患者的生存质量。

Objective: To explore the relationship between death attitude, fear of disease progression, and quality of life in end-stage lung cancer patients, and to identify effective interventions to improve their quality of life. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 157 end-stage lung cancer patients hospitalized in the Oncology Department of the Affiliated Huai'an No.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from June 2021 to May 2024. Data on general information, Chinese version of the Death Attitude Profile, Simplified Fear of Disease Progression Scale, and the Chinese version of the Cancer Patients' Quality of Life Scale were collected. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to examine the correlations among death attitude, fear of disease progression, and quality of life. Structural equation modeling was applied to test the mediating effect of death attitude between fear of disease progression and quality of life. Results: The scores for death attitudes were as follows: approach acceptance 30.31±4.62, natural acceptance 18.06±3.35, escape acceptance 17.82±2.52, fear of death 26.09±3.19, and death avoidance 14.94±2.63. The total score for fear of disease progression was 37.99±5.37, and for quality of life was 65.69±11.30. Stratified analysis showed that women had higher natural acceptance than men, patients under 60 had higher scores across multiple dimensions, patients with different educational backgrounds had statistically significant differences in the total score dimensions of natural acceptance, escape acceptance, fear of death, death escape and fear of disease progression,patients with different monthly per capita income had statistically significant differences in death evasion and total score of quality of life, patients with different types of medical payment had statistically significant differences in the dimensions of escape acceptance and death escape(all P<0.05). Approach acceptance was negatively correlated with fear of disease progression(P<0.05) and positively correlated with quality of life(P<0.05). Escape acceptance, death fear, and death avoidance were positively correlated with fear of disease progression(P<0.05) and negatively correlated with quality of life(P<0.05). Fear of disease progression was negatively correlated with quality of life(P<0.05). Mediation analysis showed that both death attitude and fear of disease progression directly affected quality of life(P<0.05). Fear of disease progression also indirectly influenced quality of life through death attitude(P<0.05), with a mediation effect of 34.70%. Conclusion: The quality of life in end-stage lung cancer patients is generally low. Death attitude and fear of disease progression are closely related to quality of life. Fear of disease progression directly predicts quality of life and also indirectly predicts it through death attitude. Clinical interventions should aim to improve death attitude and fear of disease progression to enhance the quality of life of patients.

参考文献:

[1] 张思维,郑荣寿,杨之洵,等.2000—2014年中国肿瘤登记地区肺癌发病年龄变化趋势分析[J].中华预防医学杂志,2018,52(6):579-585.
[2] 蔡猛.非小细胞肺癌骨转移患者临床特征及预后生存分析[D].南京:东南大学,2022.
[3] 房进,胡若愚,薛涛.新辅助免疫检查点抑制剂用于非小细胞肺癌治疗的研究进展[J].东南大学学报(医学版),2022,41(2):273-278.
[4] 马千惠,关玉霞,姜琳,等.肺癌患者癌症复发恐惧现状调查及影响因素分析[J].北京医学,2022,44(12):1075-1080.
[5] 孙恒文,杨艳珍,刘婷,等.癌症复发恐惧心理现状调查及其影响因素分析[J].循证医学,2018,18(5):298-303.
[6] 王业青,王艳艳,宋洁,等.养老机构老年人死亡态度及其影响因素研究[J].护理学杂志,2020,35(13):79-81.
[7] 李秋月,翟敏峰,赵阳,等.肺癌患者化疗期间出院准备度和恐惧疾病进展及家庭功能对生命质量的影响[J].中国肿瘤临床与康复,2023,30(7):444-450.
[8] 中华医学会,中华医学会肿瘤学分会,中华医学会杂志社.中华医学会肺癌临床诊疗指南(2019版)[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2020,42(4):257-287.
[9] 朱海玲,史宝欣.中文版死亡态度描绘量表修订版的信效度研究[J].中国实用护理杂志,2011,27(8):51-53.
[10] MEHNERT A,HERSCHBACH P,BERG P,et al.Progredienzangst bei brustkrebspatientinnen--validierung der kurzform des progredienzangstfragebogens PA-F-KF [Fear of progression in breast cancer patients--validation of the short form of the Fear of Progression Questionnaire(FoP-Q-SF)][J].Z Psychosom Med Psychother,2006,52(3):274-288.
[11] 万崇华,孟琼,汤学良,等.癌症患者生命质量测定量表FACT-G中文版评介[J].实用肿瘤杂志,2006(1):77-80.
[12] 张翠敏,朱贵东,肖永红.女性肺癌患者生存质量评价及影响因素分析[J].临床肺科杂志,2011,16(1):78-80.
[13] KROLL J L,JONES M,CHEN A B,et al.End-of-life care,symptom burden,and quality of life in couples facing stage Ⅳ lung cancer: the role of patient and spousal psychospirituality and discussions around fear of death and disease progression[J].Palliat Med,2023,26(5):690-696.
[14] 蔡建平,江子芳.乳腺癌患者恐惧疾病进展与生存质量的关系研究[J].护理管理杂志,2020,20(1):23-26.
[15] 崔静萍,蒋燕,赵姗姗.衰弱和抑郁在肺癌化疗患者恐惧疾病进展与生活质量间的链式中介作用[J].护理学报,2023,30(18):65-70.
[16] 陈琪,陆建,郭金和.晚期非小细胞肺癌免疫治疗研究进展[J].东南大学学报(医学版),2021,40(4):536-541.

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录
您是第 941005 位访问者


 ©《现代医学》编辑部
联系电话:025-83272481;83272479
电子邮件: xdyx@pub.seu.edu.cn

本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626

苏ICP备09058541