网站首页期刊介绍通知公告编 委 会投稿须知电子期刊广告合作联系我们
最新消息:
肺癌患者化疗所致恶心呕吐的影响因素及预测分析
作者:刘芳  陈华青  徐晋君  莫永静 
单位:南京医科大学附属淮安第一医院 肿瘤内一科, 江苏 淮安 223300
关键词:肺癌 化疗所致恶心呕吐 影响因素 预测模型 
分类号:R473.73;R734.2
出版年·卷·期(页码):2025·53·第三期(443-448)
摘要:

目的: 探讨肺癌患者化疗所致恶心呕吐(CINV)的影响因素及预测模型。方法: 回顾性纳入2022年1月至2024年6月肺癌患者158例,均接受化疗治疗,依据有无发生CINV分为CINV组(63例)与非CINV组(95例)。收集肺癌患者性别、体质量指数(BMI)、胃部疾病史、医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)得分、癌症疲乏量表(CFS)得分等资料。Logistic回归分析肺癌患者CINV的影响因素,并据上述影响因素构建预测模型,绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估肺癌患者CINV预测模型的效能。结果: CINV组患者胃部疾病史比例、晕动病史比例、有营养风险比例、HADS得分、CFS得分均高于非CINV组(均P<0.05)。Logistic回归分析显示,胃部疾病史(OR=3.795,95%CI:1.185~12.156)、晕动病史(OR=3.376,95%CI:1.237~9.214)、营养风险(OR=3.060,95%CI:1.140~8.212)、HADS得分(OR=1.308,95%CI=1.173~1.459)、CFS得分(OR=1.138,95%CI:1.083~1.218)是肺癌患者发生CINV的独立影响因素(均P<0.05)。构建肺癌患者CINV预测模型为Logit(P)=-10.241+1.334×胃部疾病史(无=0,有=1)+1.217×晕动病史(无=0,有=1)+1.118×营养风险(无=0,有=1)+0.269×HADS得分+0.129×CFS得分。ROC曲线显示,该模型预测肺癌患者发生CINV的AUC为0.869,灵敏度为0.714,特异度为0.863,准确度为0.804。结论: 胃部疾病史、晕动病史、营养风险、焦虑和抑郁症状、癌因性疲乏均为肺癌患者发生CINV的危险因素,据此构建的模型具有良好的预测效能,可为临床干预提供数据支持。

Objective: To investigate the influencing factors and predictive models of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting(CINV) in patients with lung cancer. Methods: 158 patients with lung cancer who received chemotherapy from January 2022 to June 2024 were retrospectively selected and divided into CINV group(63 cases) and non-CINV group(95 cases), according to the presence or absence of CINV. Gender, body mass index(BMI), stomach disease history, scores of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale(HADS) and Cancer Fatigue Scale(CFS) were collected. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to analyze the influencing factors of CINV in lung cancer patients, and the predictive model was constructed according to the above influencing factors, and the receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve was drawn to evaluate the efficacy of CINV prediction model in lung cancer patients. Results: The proportion of stomach disease history, motion sickness history, nutritional risk ratio, HADS score and CFS score in CINV group were higher than those in non-CINV group(all P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that history of gastric diseases(OR=3.795, 95%CI 1.185-12.156), history of motion sickness(OR=3.376, 95%CI 1.237-9.214), nutritional risk(OR=3.060, 95%CI 1.140-8.212), HADS score(OR=1.308, 95%CI 1.173-1.459), and CFS score(OR=1.138, 95%CI 1.083-1.218) were independent risk factors for CINV in lung cancer patients(all P<0.05). The prediction model for CINV in lung cancer patients was constructed as: Logit(P)=-10.241+1.334×history of gastric diseases(no=0, yes=1)+1.217×history of motion sickness(no=0, yes=1)+1.118×nutritional risk(no=0, yes=1)+0.269×HADS score+0.129×CFS score. The ROC curve analysis showed that the model had an AUC of 0.869 for predicting CINV in lung cancer patients, with a sensitivity of 0.714, specificity of 0.863, and accuracy of 0.804. Conclusion: Gastric disease history, motion sickness history, nutritional risk, anxiety and depression symptoms, and cancer-related fatigue are all influencing factors for CINV in lung cancer patients. The model built based on this model has good predictive efficacy and can provide data support for clinical intervention.

参考文献:

[1] SUNG H,FERLAY J,SIEGEL R L,et al.Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J].CA Cancer J Clin,2021,71(3): 209-249.
[2] 饶井芬,于晓磊,肇爽,等.NSCLC同步放化疗后中性粒细胞减少症风险预测[J].东南大学学报(医学版),2024,43(2): 209-215.
[3] KARTHAUS M.Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting[J].HNO,2023,71(7): 473-484.
[4] HANNAH WOOPEN,R RICHTER,R CHEKEROV,等.化疗所致恶心呕吐对复发性卵巢癌患者预后的影响:纳入1 213例患者数据的Meta分析结果[J].癌症,2022,41(6): 289-298.
[5] KENNEDY S K F,GOODALL S,LEE S F,et al.2020 ASCO,2023 NCCN,2023 MASCC/ESMO,and 2019 CCO: a comparison of antiemetic guidelines for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in cancer patients[J].Support Care Cancer,2024,32(5): 280.
[6] 张慧,张萍,郭汝,等.胃癌术后辅助化疗期间恶心呕吐风险预测模型的建立及验证[J].临床外科杂志,2024,32(5): 484-488.
[7] 牟倩倩,刘珊珊,汪秀云,等.肺癌首次铂类化疗所致恶心呕吐现状及心理状况分析[J].重庆医学,2018,47(26): 3445-3449.
[8] 支修益,石远凯,于金明.中国原发性肺癌诊疗规范(2015年版)[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2015,37(1): 67-78.
[9] 中华医学会肠外肠内营养学分会,营养风险-不足-支持-结局-成本/效果多中心协作组,张献娜,等.营养风险筛查和全球(营养)领导人发起的营养不良诊断(GLIM)第二、三步流程(共识2020)[J].中华临床营养杂志,2020,28(4): 193-200.
[10] ZIGMOND A S,SNAITH R P.The hospital anxiety and depression scale[J].Acta Psychiatr Scand,1983,67(6): 361-370.
[11] 张凤玲,丁玥,韩丽沙.癌症疲乏量表中文版的信效度[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2011,25(11): 810-813.
[12] 叶艳欣,秦岚,骆佳慧,等.肺癌患者化疗相关症状群的发生现状及影响因素分析[J].中华护理杂志,2023,58(18): 2230-2238.
[13] 张筱童,戴琪,戚志惠,等.肺癌患者术后恶心呕吐的危险因素及预测模型研究[J].现代医学,2022,50(12): 1545-1549.
[14] HAYASHI T,SHIMOKAWA M,MATSUO K,et al.Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting(CINV) with carboplatin plus pemetrexed or carboplatin plus paclitaxel in patients with lung cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis[J].BMC Cancer,2021,21(1): 74.
[15] 杜巧红,廉莉,吴瑞丽.老年妇科恶性肿瘤患者化疗相关性恶心呕吐与癌因性疲乏的关系及其影响因素[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2024,23(4): 276-280.
[16] 秦保东,焦晓栋,臧远胜.从化疗所致恶心呕吐的精准防控谈航海晕动病的综合防治[J].实用临床医药杂志,2022,26(19): 125-128.
[17] 张丽娟,黄勇,姜孝娟,等.肺癌住院患者营养不良风险调查及其影响因素分析[J].现代生物医学进展,2021,21(16): 3125-3130.
[18] 雷蕾,岳朝丽,陈丹,等.肺癌患者营养不良风险与癌因性疲乏和生活质量的相关性研究[J].现代生物医学进展,2020,20(24): 4780-4784.
[19] 刘莉.基于菌-肠-脑轴的肠肽与焦虑抑郁关系的研究进展[J].中华全科医学,2022,20(8): 1388-1391,1399.
[20] 张成.祛毒扶正汤联合化疗治疗中晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效及对患者癌因性疲乏、化疗耐受性的影响[J].四川中医,2019,37(1): 107-109.
[21] 王鹏程,孟爱凤,智晓旭,等.芳香疗法预防肿瘤患者化疗后恶心及呕吐的系统评价[J].解放军护理杂志,2020,37(4): 6-10.
[22] 徐芸,张伟,江守伟,等.有氧运动结合抗阻运动对化疗期肿瘤患者癌因性疲乏及生活质量干预效果的Meta分析[J].护士进修杂志,2023,38(5): 424-430.
[23] 高晓雯,袁玲,严婷婷,等.正念训练联合情志干预缓解肿瘤安宁期患者癌因性疲乏的效果观察[J].现代生物医学进展,2021,21(11): 2069-2072,2163.

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录
您是第 885764 位访问者


 ©《现代医学》编辑部
联系电话:025-83272481;83272479
电子邮件: xdyx@pub.seu.edu.cn

本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626

苏ICP备09058541