网站首页期刊介绍通知公告编 委 会投稿须知电子期刊广告合作联系我们
最新消息:
安罗替尼联合埃克替尼治疗EGFR21外显子L858R突变肺腺癌合并脑转移的临床观察
作者:闫绍辉1  付晏1  王栋2  徐凯3 
单位:1. 秦皇岛市第四医院 胸部肿瘤科, 河北 秦皇岛 066000;
2. 秦皇岛市第四医院 影像科, 河北 秦皇岛 066000;
3. 秦皇岛市第四医院 头颈外科, 河北 秦皇岛 066000
关键词:L858R突变 腺癌脑转移 EGFR21外显子 安罗替尼 埃克替尼 基因检测 联合治疗 
分类号:R734.2
出版年·卷·期(页码):2024·52·第九期(1444-1449)
摘要:

目的: 探究安罗替尼联合埃克替尼治疗表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)21外显子L858R突变肺腺癌合并脑转移患者的可行性及临床效果。方法: 选取2021年1月至2023年12月我院收治的晚期肺腺癌合并多发脑转移的患者,进行高通量测序技术(NGS)基因检测。筛选出101例EGFR21外显子L858R突变患者,随机分为对照组(n=51)和观察组(n=50),对照组接受埃克替尼治疗,观察组接受安罗尼联合埃克替尼治疗,比较两组疗效。结果: 治疗后,观察组客观缓解率(ORR)为76.00%,高于对照组的50.98%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组和对照组疾病控制率(DCR)分别为94.00%、90.20%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗前,两组肿瘤标志物水平对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,两组糖类抗原125(CA125)、癌胚抗原(CEA)、组织多肽抗原(TPA)、细胞质胸苷激酶1(TK1)水平均低于治疗前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),且治疗后观察组CA125、CEA、TPA、TK1水平均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前,两组脑部肿瘤长径对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),治疗后,观察组肿瘤长径短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前,两组生活质量各项评分差异统计学意义(P>0.05),治疗后,两组躯体功能、角色功能、认知功能、心理功能及社会功能评分均高于治疗前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),且观察组躯体功能、角色功能、认知功能、心理功能及社会功能评分均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,两组在骨髓移植、胃肠道反应、皮疹及高血压的不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论: 安罗替尼与埃克替尼的联合治疗方案不仅能有效抑制EGFR21外显子L858R突变的肺腺癌合并脑转移患者的肿瘤生长与转移,而且能显著降低肿瘤标志物水平,有助于提高患者生活质量。该治疗方案未增加不良反应风险,具有良好的安全性。

Objective: To explore the feasibility and clinical effects of the combination of Anlotinib and Ecetinib in the treatment of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR) 21 exon L858R mutation in lung adenocarcinoma with brain metastasis. Methods: Patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and multiple brain metastases admitted to our hospital from January, 2021 to December, 2023 were selected as out study subjects. 101 patients with EGFR21 exon L858R mutation were screened out by high-throughput sequencing(NGS) gene testing. The patients were randomly divided it into control group(n=51) and observation group(n=50). Patients in the control group received Ecetinib treatment while patients in the observation group received Anlotinib combined with Ecetinib.The effect of the treatment in the two groups were compared. Results: After treatment, the objective response rate(ORR) of the observation group was 76.00%, which was higher than 50.98% of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference(P>0.05) in disease control rate(DCR) between the two groups.Before treatment, there was no statistically significant difference in the levels of tumor markers between the two groups(P>0.05).After the treatment, the average levels of carbohydrate antigen 125(CA125), carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA), tissue polypeptide antigen(TPA), and thymidine kinase 1(TK1) in the two groups were lower than those before treatment with statistical significance(P<0.05).In addition, the average levels of CA125, CEA, TPA and TK1 in the observation group were lower than those in the control group with statistical significance(P<0.05).Before treatment, there was no statistically significant difference in the length and diameter of brain tumors between the two groups(P>0.05), but after treatment, the length and diameter of tumors in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Before treatment, there was no significant difference in various scores of life quality between the two groups(P>0.05).After treatment, the scores of physical, role, cognitive, psychological, and social functions in both groups were higher than those before treatment with statistical significance(P<0.05).In addition, the scores of physical, role, cognitive, psychological and social functions in the observation group were higher than those in the control group with significant differences(P<0.05).After treatment, there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions such as bone marrow transplantation, gastrointestinal reactions, rash, and hypertension between the two groups(P>0.05). Conclusion: The combination therapy of Enrotinib and Exetinib not only effectively inhibits the growth and metastasis of lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR21 exon L858R mutation and brain metastasis, but also significantly reduces the level of tumor markers, thereby promoting the improvement of patients' quality of life.The treatment regimen is safe and doesn't increase the risk of adverse reactions.

参考文献:

[1] 姚舒洋,李小雪,王淳秀,等.埃克替尼联合抗血管药物一线治疗EGFR突变晚期肺腺癌的单中心研究[J].首都医科大学学报,2022,43(2):289-293.
[2] 江文利,张琳,李君瑶,等.奥希替尼联合赛沃替尼靶向治疗EGFR-TKI耐药伴发MET扩增的NSCLC 1例报告及文献复习[J].吉林大学学报(医学版),2023,49(3):782-788.
[3] 罗鹏辉,莫敦昌,黄尚校,等.SIB-IGRT联合埃克替尼治疗EGFR突变型肺腺癌脑转移的前瞻性随机对照研究[J].微创医学,2022,17(5):545-549.
[4] 郭旭东,王志伟,侯欣.盐酸埃克替尼联合调强放疗对表皮生长因子受体突变阳性肺腺癌脑转移的有效性及安全性分析[J].世界临床药物,2022,43(9):1118-1123,1137.
[5] 蒋岸风,周诗善,周琴,等.表皮生长因子受体突变肺腺癌脑膜转移患者的临床特征及预后影响因素分析[J].中华医学杂志,2023,103(34):2713-2719.
[6] 中华医学会肿瘤学分会,中华医学会杂志社.中华医学会肺癌临床诊疗指南(2023版)[J].中华医学杂志,2023,103(27):2037-2074.
[7] 皇甫娟,李文永,张慧辉.安罗替尼胶囊治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌对患者VEGF 水平及生存期的影响,实用癌症杂志.2020,35(3):360-362.
[8] 武阳,陆翰杰,水会锋.既往免疫经治的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者接受安罗替尼联合PD-1单抗的疗效及安全性[J].实用医学杂志,2023,39(5):572-578.
[9] 杨光霞,程云涛,刘琳琳,等.安罗替尼联合厄洛替尼治疗表皮生长因子受体突变阳性晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的临床研究[J].中国临床药理学杂志,2023,39(20):2905-2909.
[10] 李梦远,华陈,罗建华,等.EGFR-TKI治疗表皮生长因子受体野生型晚期肺腺癌1例并文献复习[J].临床与病理杂志,2019,39(12):2886-2889.
[11] 严家菊,张玉萍.安罗替尼致间质性肺水肿[J].药物不良反应杂志,2023,25(7):439-441.
[12] 张群,刘振昌,赵亮,等.安罗替尼胶囊联合培美曲赛注射液和顺铂注射液治疗非鳞状非小细胞肺癌患者的临床研究[J].中国临床药理学杂志,2023,39(7):932-935.
[13] 陈海峰.安罗替尼三线及以上治疗66例中晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效及影响因素分析[J].浙江医学,2020,42(14):1524-1528.
[14] 尹延鹏,韩利会,杨秋安.安罗替尼三线及以上治疗中晚期非小细胞肺癌的效果及影响因素分析[J].中国当代医药,2023,30(36):104-111.
[15] 黄锐,张允清.安罗替尼单药在PS评分差的广泛期小细胞肺癌二线治疗中的临床疗效[J].国际肿瘤学杂志,2023,50(12):705-710.
[16] 杨杰,刘建江,毛绩伟,等.安罗替尼联合全脑放疗治疗无驱动基因突变非小细胞肺癌多发脑转移患者的效果及安全性[J].肿瘤研究与临床,2023,35(9):664-669.
[17] 郑国红,李娜,肖磊,等.手术联合放疗及安罗替尼靶向药治疗非小细胞肺癌单发脑转移瘤患者临床疗效研究[J].中国煤炭工业医学杂志,2023,26(2):138-142.
[18] 丁曼华,徐海亭,王强,等.安罗替尼联合大分割放疗治疗非小细胞肺癌脑转移的临床疗效及不良反应[J].徐州医科大学学报,2022,42(8):558-563.

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录
您是第 894319 位访问者


 ©《现代医学》编辑部
联系电话:025-83272481;83272479
电子邮件: xdyx@pub.seu.edu.cn

本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626

苏ICP备09058541