网站首页期刊介绍通知公告编 委 会投稿须知电子期刊广告合作联系我们
最新消息:
成都市农村妇女两癌筛查现状及影响因素研究
作者:魏玉兰1  王欢欢2  王娟秀1  冯斐2  沈丽琴3 
单位:1. 成都市温江区妇幼保健院 妇产科, 四川 成都 611130;
2. 成都市温江区妇幼保健院 基保科, 四川 成都 611130;
3. 四川大学华西公共卫生学院 儿少卫生与妇幼保健学系, 四川 成都 610041
关键词:农村 妇女 两癌筛查 影响因素 
分类号:R173
出版年·卷·期(页码):2022·50·第十期(1274-1282)
摘要:

目的:分析成都市35~64岁农村妇女乳腺癌和宫颈癌(简称两癌)筛查现状及影响因素,为农村适龄妇女两癌的防控提供参考。方法:对辖区内35~64岁的农村适龄妇女进行免费两癌筛查。乳腺癌筛查进行乳腺的视诊、触诊和彩超检查;宫颈癌筛查包括妇科检查、宫颈细胞学检查、阴道镜检查和组织病理学检查。对检查结果及影响因素进行统计分析。结果:本次筛查对象平均年龄(48.9±6.5)岁。乳腺超声BI-RADS分级显示,3级占7.1%,4级占1.4%。宫颈细胞学异常率为8.9%,阴道镜检查异常率为22.0%,病理活检宫颈癌检出率为76.6/10万,癌前病变检出率为919.0/10万。多因素Logistic回归分析显示:年龄(OR=0.895,95%CI 0.842~0.953)是乳腺BI-RADS分级评分高级别的保护因素(P<0.05),既往做过乳腺手术或活检(OR=2.884,95%CI 1.305~6.375)、乳房结节(OR=2.536,95%CI 1.638~3.926)、乳房团块(OR=8.383,95%CI 1.929~36.435)、乳房肿块(OR=8.092,95%CI 2.116~30.945)是乳腺BI-RADS分级评分高级别的危险因素(均P<0.05),绝经(OR=0.697,95%CI 0.529~0.918)、避孕套避孕(OR=0.625,95%CI 0.434~0.900)是宫颈细胞学检查异常的保护因素(均P<0.05)。结论:农村妇女免费两癌筛查中,应将35~49岁年龄段,既往做过乳腺手术或活检,乳腺体检中发现乳房结节、乳房团块、乳房肿块,未绝经妇女、未使用避孕套避孕等妇女,作为重点关注对象,达到早发现、早诊断、早治疗的目的,改善农村妇女健康水平。

Objective: To provide evidence for prevention and control of cervical cancer and breast cancer(short for the two-cancers) in rural women aged at 35 to 64 years via investigating their current status of screening and influencing factors. Methods: Free screening for the two-cancers were conducted for the rural women aged at 35 to 64 years old in the district. The breast cancer screening involves visual inspection, palpation, and ultrasound color doppler of the breast. Cervical cancer screening includes gynecological examination, cervical cytology, colposcopy, and histopathology examinations. Statistical analyses were performed to analyze the influencing factors of the results of those screening tests. Results: The average age of the screened women was (48.9±6.5) years old. As for the breast cancer, women with BI-RADS grade-3 and grade-4 measured via breast ultrasonography consisted of 7.1% and 1.4% of all participants, respectively. As for the screening results of the cervical cancer, 8.9% participants had abnormal cervical cytology, and 22% of women who underwent colposcopy test had abnormal results. The detection rate of cervical cancer and precancerous lesions using pathological biopsy was 76.6/100 000, and 919.0/100 000, respectively. Results from the multivariate Logistic regression analyses showed that age(OR=0.895, 95%CI 0.842-0.953) was a protective factor for BI-RADS grading score(P<0.05), and having undergone breast surgery or biopsy(OR=2.884, 95%CI 1.305-6.375), having breast nodules(OR=2.536, 95%CI 1.638-3.926), having breast lumps(OR=8.383, 95%CI 1.929-36.435), and having breast mass(OR=8.092, 95%CI 2.116-30.945) are risk factors for higher-grade BI-RADS score(P<0.05).Menopause(OR=0.697, 95%CI 0.529-0.918) and condom contraception(OR=0.625, 95%CI 0.434-0.900) were protective factors for abnormal cervical cytology(P<0.05). Conclusion: Women who were 35-49 years old, have undergone breast surgery or biopsy, had breast nodules, breast lumps, or breast lumps, were premenopausal, or had not used condoms for contraception should be focused on in the two-cancers screening in rural women. This will help with early detection, early diagnosis, and early treatment of the two-cancers, and improve the health level of rural women.

参考文献:

[1] SUNG H, FERLAY J, SIEGEL R L, et al.Global cancer statistics 2020:GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J].CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3):209-249.
[2] BRAY F, FERLAY J, SOERJOMATARAM I, et al.Global cancer statistics 2018:GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J].CA Cancer J Clin, 2018, 68(6):394-424.
[3] 李道娟, 师金, 靳晶, 等.宫颈癌的流行病学趋势[J].中华肿瘤杂志, 2021, 43(9):912-916.
[4] 杨学岩, 王平, 马丽君.2014年-2018年育龄期妇女恶性肿瘤死亡谱的帕累托图分析[J].中国病案, 2019, 20(7):56-58.
[5] 李宜臻, 郑怡, 邓玉皎, 等.1990~2019年中国女性乳腺癌疾病负担及危险因素研究[J].中国循证医学杂志, 2021, 21(8):876-881.
[6] 李想, 刘灿, 周维, 等.2005~2015年中国宫颈癌发病与死亡趋势分析[J].华中科技大学学报(医学版), 2021, 50:325-330, 346.
[7] MOLASSIOTIS A, TYROVOLAS S, GINE-VAZQUEZ I, et al.Organized breast cancer screening not only reduces mortality from breast cancer but also significantly decreases disability-adjusted life years:analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study and screening programme availability in 130 countries[J].ESMO Open, 2021, 6(3):1-7.
[8] JARI H, GRAHAM B, MATHIEU B, et al.Trends in breast cancer mortality in Sweden before and after implementation of mammography screening[J].PLoS One, 2018, 6(9):e22422.
[9] 雍千叶, 刘万花, 叶媛媛, 等.乳腺X线BI-RADS分类的临床应用价值(J).东南大学学报(医学版), 2021, 40(3):385-389.
[10] 赵颖.2013-2017年南京市秦淮区女性宫颈癌和乳腺癌检查情况分析[J].中国妇幼保健, 2019, 34(23):5514-5516.
[11] 池雅琴.2012-2015年吴江区适龄妇女宫颈癌和乳腺癌检查结果分析[J].中国妇幼保健, 2016, 31(22):4620-4622.
[12] 张雪丽.襄阳市适龄妇女两癌检查情况分析[J].中国妇幼保健, 2017, 32(12):2559-2561.
[13] 龙琦.贵阳市2015-2019年农村妇女宫颈癌和乳腺癌检查情况分析[J].现代预防医学, 2020, 47(21):3919-3923.
[14] 高丽丽.北京地区35~64岁农村妇女高危型HPV感染情况分析[J].中国妇产科临床杂志, 2015, 16(6):494-497.
[15] 龚敏, 刘巧玲.高危型HPV分型定量与宫颈癌相关病变关系研究(J).现代医学, 2022, 50(4):460-465
[16] 唐文佩, 郑佶祺.宫颈癌检查的历史与争论研究[J].中国科技史杂志, 2021, 42(3):335-344.
[17] 孙虹.宫颈癌检查方法的研究现状[J].医疗装备, 2021, 34(18):195-196.
[18] 许惠娟, 刘坤, 郑景妹, 等.厦门地区3144例女性人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)感染及宫颈病变检查分析[J].基础医学与临床, 2021, 41(11):1643-1647.
[19] 张文洁, 吴美娟.HPV分型与液基细胞学联合检测在宫颈癌及癌前病变检查中的效能[J].临床医学研究与实践, 2021, 6(31):105-107.

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录
您是第 748836 位访问者


 ©《现代医学》编辑部
联系电话:025-83272481;83272479
电子邮件: xdyx@pub.seu.edu.cn

苏ICP备09058541