Objective: To analyze the value of human leukocyte antigen-E(sHLA-E) in the diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of endometrial cancer. Methods: 82 endometrial cancer patients who were treated in the hospital from June 2016 to June 2019 were selected as the endometrial cancer group. 80 patients with benign uterine lesions in the same period were aelected as benign uterine lesions group. Another 60 healthy people in the same period were selected as health groups. The clinical data of subjects in three groups were analyzed.Results: The levels of serum CA125, HE4, and sHLA-E of the three groups were significant (F=290.928, P<0.001; F=382.416, P<0.001; F=52.673, P<0.001), the endometrial cancer group was higher than the uterine benign lesions group and the healthy group, and the uterine benign lesions group was higher than the healthy group, showing an upward trend with the severity of the disease (P<0.05); The sHLA-E level of patients with clinical stage Ⅲ and Ⅳ was higher than that of Ⅰ and Ⅱ, the difference was significant (t=2.399, P=0.019); After 18 months of follow-up, the sHLA-E level of patients with recurrence of endometrial cancer was significantly higher than that of patients without recurrence, the difference was significant (t=2.088, P=0.040). The results of Pearson correlation analysis showed that serum sHLA-E levels in patients with endometrial cancer were positively correlated with CA125 and HE4 (r=0.513, P<0.05; r=0.539, P<0.05). ROC curve analysis results showed that the AUC of serum sHLA-E level in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer was 0.823 (95% CI 0.755-0.878, P<0.01), the sensitivity was 73.17% and the specificity was 78.75%.Conclusion: The serum sHLA-E level of patients with endometrial cancer is significantly higher than that of normal people and patients with benign uterine lesions, and as the severity of the disease and the clinical stage show an upward trend, the detection of serum sHLA-E level can help the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis evaluation of patients with endometrial cancer. |
[1] 李晨,韦唯,张志将,等.武汉市女性子宫内膜癌流行病学调查及危险因素分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2019,34(17):4064-4067.
[2] CHEN B J,BYRNE F L,TAKENAKA K,et al.Analysis of the circular RNA transcriptome in endometrial cancer[J].Oncotarget,2018,9(5):5786-5796.
[3] 汤希凡,秦辛玲,蓝兰,等.人附睾蛋白4在子宫内膜癌诊断中的临床价值[J].国际检验医学杂志,2013,34(11):1440-1441.
[4] 胡红琳,黄有烨,王佑民,等.脂联素与肥胖相关的女性肿瘤的关系研究进展[J].安徽医学,2018,39(6):760-763.
[5] 吕巧英.子宫内膜癌肿瘤微环境的免疫调控机制进展[J].复旦学报(医学版),2016,43(4):475-478.
[6] 张一琼,于江燕,朱元方,等.子宫内膜癌肿瘤微环境的研究进展[J].现代肿瘤医学,2016,24(16):2651-2655.
[7] 徐筠娉,王宋兴,何柳媚,等.抗原肽对人多发性骨髓瘤细胞HLA-E的表达调控及对NK细胞抗肿瘤活性的影响[J].中国输血杂志,2016,29(9):881-886.
[8] 史冬梅,潘长宝,王一倩,等.HLA-E在老年人群结肠癌前病变中的表达研究[J].老年医学与保健,2018,24(3):319-321,356.
[9] 彭鸿灵,赵霞.2015年NCCN子宫内膜癌临床实践指南解读[J].中国医师杂志,2015,17(8):1144-1146.
[10] 代学华,叶永梅,郭停,等.CA125、HE4、ROMA对卵巢肿瘤诊断及良恶性鉴别的临床价值[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2018,17(14):1550-1553.
[11] 闫慧,薛冰.血清肿瘤标志物CA125、CEA联合检测在宫颈癌诊断中的临床价值[J].国际检验医学杂志,2016,37(1):134-135.
[12] 罗树玲,郑春艳,曹锦慧,等.血清CA125和HE4检测在子宫内膜癌中的临床意义[J].中国实验诊断学,2016,20(9):1490-1492.
[13] 敬源.人附睾蛋白4、CA125和卵巢恶性风险预测模型与卵巢癌中的诊断、临床病理及分期的相关性研究[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2017,16(6):546-549.
[14] 廖胜斌,李力.CA125和人附睾蛋白4对预测卵巢上皮性癌治疗效果及预后的意义[J].中华妇产科杂志,2017,52(6):429-432.
[15] 陈悦悦,黄仲英,樊伟,等.HLA-E介导孕激素对绒毛膜癌JEG-3细胞血管内皮生长因子表达的调节作用[J].实用妇产科杂志,2019,35(7):514-517.
[16] 王遥,崔国英,王飞,等.人类白细胞抗原-E在宫颈癌中的表达及意义[J].山东大学学报(医学版),2016,54(9):59-63. |