网站首页期刊介绍通知公告编 委 会投稿须知电子期刊广告合作联系我们
最新消息:
不同剂量右美托咪定配伍罗哌卡因硬膜外麻醉在股骨干骨折患者中的临床应用
作者:余定华1  方丽萍1  孙敏2 
单位:1. 东南大学附属中大医院溧水分院 麻醉科, 江苏 南京 211200;
2. 萍乡市妇幼保健院 麻醉科, 江西 萍乡 337055
关键词:右美托咪定 罗哌卡因 股骨干骨折 硬膜外麻醉 
分类号:R683.42;R614.42
出版年·卷·期(页码):2019·47·第三期(316-320)
摘要:

目的:探讨不同剂量右美托咪定配伍罗哌卡因硬膜外麻醉在股骨干骨折患者中的临床应用效果。方法:选取东南大学附属中大医院溧水分院2015年2月至2018年2月行股骨干骨折切开复位内固定术的患者共计88例,年龄27~63岁,采用计算机随机软件,依据右美托咪定浓度不同将纳入患者随机分为4组:0.25 μg·kg-1右美托咪定配伍0.75%罗哌卡因组(D0.25组)、0.50 μg·kg-1右美托咪定配伍0.75%罗哌卡因组(D0.50组)、0.75 μg·kg-1右美托咪定配伍0.75%罗哌卡因组(D0.75组)、0.75%罗哌卡因组(R组),每组22例。记录4组患者感觉、运动阻滞起效时间、持续时间及术后24 h镇痛泵按压次数、术后恶心呕吐(PONV)和术后寒战发生率。分别使用Bromage分级和Ramsay镇静分级评价患者出室即刻运动阻滞情况及镇静程度。结果:在感觉阻滞方面,D0.50组和D0.75组患者感觉阻滞起效时间显著短于R组患者,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。D0.50组和D0.75组患者感觉阻滞持续时间显著长于R组和D0.25组患者,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在运动阻滞方面,4组患者运动阻滞起效时间和持续时间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。D0.50组和D0.75组患者术后寒战发生率显著低于R组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。4组患者Bromage分级人数差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。D0.50组和D0.75组患者术后镇痛泵按压次数显著少于R组和D0.25组患者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:罗哌卡因配伍0.50 μg·kg-1右美托咪定能够优化罗哌卡因在股骨干骨折切开复位内固定患者硬膜外麻醉中的镇痛效果,并且不影响患者运动功能,在提供满意镇静效果的同时还能减少术后镇痛药物使用、缓解患者术后寒战。

参考文献:

[1] LI A,YUEN V M,GOULAY-DUFAY S,et al.Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dexmedetomidine[J].Drug Development Communications,2016,42(12):1917-1927.
[2] TARIKCI K E,AYDIN G.Effects of dexmedetomidine infusion during spinal anesthesia on hemodynamics and sedation[J].Libyan Journal of Medicine,2018,13(1):1436845.
[3] SINGH A K,KUMAR A,KUMAR A,et al.A comparison of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and neostigmine as adjuvant to ropivacaine for lower limb surgeries:a double-blind randomized controlled study[J].Nesthesia Essays & Researches,2017,11(4):987-992.
[4] BABU S C,MENON G,VASU B K,et al.Postoperative ultrasound guided continuous femoral nerve blockade for unilateral total knee arthroplasty:a comparison of 0.125% bupivacaine and 0.2% ropivacaine[J].Anesthesia Essays & Researches,2017,11(4):1026-1029.
[5] ZHAO Z Y,GAN J H,LIU J B,et al.Clinical evaluation of combination of dexmedetomidine and midazolam vs. dexmedetomidine alone for sedation during spinal anesthesia[J].Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences,2017,24(8):1758-1762.
[6] PRAMILA S.Comparative study for better adjuvant with ropivacaine in epidural anesthesia[J].Anesthesia Essays & Researches,2016,10(2):218-222.
[7] KARHADE S S,ACHARYA S A,HARNAGALE K.Comparative analysis of epidural bupivacaine versus bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine for vaginal hysterectomy[J].Anesthesia Essays & Researches,2015,9(3):310-313.
[8] WEERINK M A,STRUYS M M,HANNIVOORT L N,et al.Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dexmedetomidine[J].Clinical Pharmacokinetics,2017,56(8):893-913.
[9] RASHMI H D,KOMALA H K.Effect of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to 0.75% ropivacaine in interscalene brachial plexus block using nerve stimulator:a prospective,randomized double-blind study[J].Anesthesia Essays & Researches,2017,11(1):134-139.
[10] HU X,LI J,ZHOU R,et al.Dexmedetomidine added to local anesthetic mixture of lidocaine and ropivacaine enhances onset and prolongs duration of a popliteal approach to sciatic nerve blockade[J].Clinical Therapeutics,2016,39(1):89-97.
[11] YOO H,ⅡROLA T,VILO S,et al.Mechanism-based population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling of intravenous and intranasal dexmedetomidine in healthy subjects[J].European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology,2015,71(10):1197-1207.
[12] KUNDRA T S,KAUR P.The minimum dose of dexmedetomidine required for cessation of postspinal anesthesia shivering:A prospective observational study[J].Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology,2017,33(4):493-495.
[13] PANNEER M,MURUGAIYAN P,RAO S V.A comparative study of intravenous dexmedetomidine and intravenous clonidine for postspinal shivering in patients undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgeries[J].Anesthesia Essays & Researches,2017,11(1):151-154.

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录
您是第 744967 位访问者


 ©《现代医学》编辑部
联系电话:025-83272481;83272479
电子邮件: xdyx@pub.seu.edu.cn

苏ICP备09058541