网站首页期刊介绍通知公告编 委 会投稿须知电子期刊广告合作联系我们
最新消息:
脑梗死合并房颤抗栓治疗的用药分布情况调查
作者:陈颖  陈戈  王志海 
单位:广东省湛江中心人民医院 神经内科, 广东 湛江 524037
关键词:脑梗死 房颤 抗栓治疗 抗血小板治疗 抗凝治疗 HAS-BLED评分 
分类号:R743.33;R541.75
出版年·卷·期(页码):2017·36·第四期(491-494)
摘要:

目的:对脑梗死合并房颤抗栓治疗的用药分布情况进行调查。方法:选取我院2012年1月至2015年1月间收治的249例脑梗死合并房颤患者,收集患者的人口学和临床资料,并以房颤出血评分(HAS-BLED评分)对患者进行出血风险评估。结果:本组249例脑梗死合并房颤患者中单独服用阿司匹林102例(40.96%),单独服用氯吡格雷49例(19.68%),合并服用阿司匹林+氯吡格雷双抗28例(11.24%),皮下注射低分子肝素7例(2.81%),服用华法林31例(12.45%),未用药32例(12.85%)。脑梗死合并房颤总抗栓治疗率87.15%(217例),明显高于未治疗率12.85%(32例),差异具有统计学意义(χ2=274.900,P<0.05)。其中抗血小板治疗率71.89%(179例)明显高于抗凝治疗率15.26%(38例),差异具有统计学意义(χ2=162.368,P<0.05)。根据HAS-BLED评分进行分组,157例HAS-BLED评分≥3分的患者中,抗血小板治疗121例(77.07%),抗凝治疗10例(6.37%),未用药26例(16.56%);92例HAS-BLED评分 < 3分的患者中,抗血小板治疗58例(63.04%),抗凝治疗28例(30.43%),未用药6例(6.52%)。HAS-BLED评分≥3分组的抗血小板治疗率和未治疗率高于HAS-BLED评分 < 3分组,而抗凝治疗率低于HAS-BLED评分 < 3分组,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。除HAS-BLED评分对抗栓治疗有较大影响外,性别、年龄、受教育程度、是否医保等因素均对抗栓治疗有一定的影响。结论:脑梗死合并房颤患者抗栓治疗中抗凝治疗的华法林用药率不足,出血风险的担忧是其主要的影响因素。而HAS-BLED评分能很好地对脑梗死合并房颤患者出血风险进行评估,从而决定其抗栓治疗的用药。

Objective: To investigate and analyze the distribution of drug use in the treatment of cerebral infarction complicated with atrial fibrillation and analyze its influencing factors.Methods: 249 cases of patients with cerebral infarction complicated with atrial fibrillation were selected from January 2012 to January 2015 in our hospital,demographic and clinical data of patients were collected,the risk of bleeding of patients was evaluated by atrial fibrillation hemorrhage score (HAS-BLED score).Results: 102 cases of patients with cerebral infarction and atrial fibrillation (40.96%) were used aspirin alone among 249 cases of patients,49cases of patients used clopidogrel alone(19.68%). 28 cases of patients were combined use of aspirin and clopidogrel(11.24%), 7 cases of patients usedlow molecular heparin(2.81%), 31 cases of patients used warfarin (12.45%),32 cases of patients were not used drug(12.85%).Treatment rate of patients with cerebral infarction complicated with atrial fibrillation was 87.15%(217 cases),significantly higher than 12.85% of the untreated rate (32 cases),the difference had statistical significance(χ2=274.900,P<0.05).Antiplatelet treatment rate(71.89%,179 cases) was significantly higher thananticoagulant treatment rate(15.26%,38cases), the difference had statistical significance(χ2=162.368,P<0.05). According to HAS-BLED score,they were divided into two groups. HAS-BLED scores ≥ 3 scores group had157 cases of patients,121 cases of which(77.07%) received antiplatelet treatment, 10 cases(6.37%)received anticoagulation treatment,26 caseswere not used drugs(16.56%);92 cases of patients were inHAS-BLED scores < 3 scores group,58 cases of which(63.04%) received antiplatelet treatment, 28 cases received anticoagulant treatment (30.43%),6 cases of were not used drugs(6.52%).Antiplatelet treatment rate and untreated rate of HAS-BLED score ≥ 3 scores group were higher than those of HAS-BLED score < 3 scores group, the difference had statistical significance(P<0.05). Conclusion: Warfarin drug use rate of anticoagulation treatment in treatment of anti thrombosis of patients with cerebral infarction complicated with atrial fibrillation is not enough, and the risk of bleeding is the main impact factor. While HAS-BLED score is goodfor bleeding risk assessment of patients with cerebral infarction and atrial fibrillation,so as to determine its antithrombotic treatment drugs.

参考文献:

[1] 何森,王斯,陈晓平.心房颤动发病机制的研究进展[J].华西医学,2012(5):794-797.
[2] 张丛,李涛.心房颤动的抗栓治疗[J].中国心血管病研究,2014,12(1):70-73.
[3] 中华医学会心血管病学分会,中国心律失常联盟.心房颤动抗凝治疗中国专家共识[J].心脑血管病防治,2012,51(3):173-177.
[4] 魏勇,欧阳平,汪自龙,等.抗栓不足致心房颤动合并急性心肌梗死患者并发急性脑梗死[J].临床误诊误治,2011,24(10):18-19.
[5] APOSTOLAKIS S,LANE D A,GUO Y,et al.Performance of the HEMORR(2) HAGES,ATRIA,and HAS-BLED bleeding risk-prediction scores in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing anticoagulation[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2012,60(9):861-867.
[6] 王光胜,童道明,杨同慧,等.心房颤动合并后循环脑梗死患者的临床特点分析[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2015,17(12):1250-1252.
[7] 张瑞雷,宋兵,王邦宁.老年非瓣膜心房颤动及合并脑梗死住院患者抗栓治疗调查[J].中国临床保健杂志,2014,17(3):263-266.
[8] 李琳,程洁,干静,等.脑梗死合并心房颤动358例抗凝治疗状况分析[J].中国综合临床,2014,30(4):379-382.
[9] 罗羽慧,崔坤,尹纯,等.高龄老年房颤患者抗栓治疗的疗效及安全性研究[J].重庆医学,2015,44(22):3107-3109.
[10] 臧小彪,张树龙.心房颤动抗凝治疗出血风险HAS-BLED评分系统的综合评价[J].中华心律失常学杂志,2012,16(5):338-340.
[11] 李爽,刘畅,张弘,等.腔隙性脑梗死老年患者并发肺部感染多因素分析[J].现代医学,2012,40(1):10-13.
[12] 庄燕,陈明龙.房颤的射频消融治疗[J].东南大学学报:医学版,2014,33(4):531-536.

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录
您是第 756013 位访问者


 ©《现代医学》编辑部
联系电话:025-83272481;83272479
电子邮件: xdyx@pub.seu.edu.cn

苏ICP备09058541