Objective: To investigate the therapeutic effect of transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate (TUPKP) on benign prostatic hyperplasia and the effect of intraoperative blood loss, duration of bladder irrigation and indwelling time of catheter. Methods: Retrospective analysis was used to analyze the clinical data of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia treated in our hospital from March 2006 to January 2016. According to the treatment, they were divided into TUPKP and transurethral resection (TURP) group. Observed the general surgery of the two groups, compared the laboratory indicators, complications and postoperative recovery of the patients in the two groupsbefore and after surgery.Results: The operative time, postoperative bladder irrigation time and operation after indwelling catheter time of TUPKP group were shorter than TURP group, the intraoperative bleeding was less than TURP group, but resection of the prostate quality was more than TURP group (P<0.05); The incidence of transurethral resection syndrome, urethral stricture and secondary bleeding of the two groups had no significant difference(P>0.05); The Qmax, QOL and IPSS scores of the two groups at 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery had no significant difference (P>0.05).Conclusion: TUPKP has good therapeutic effect on benign prostatic hyperplasia, which can reduce the amount of bleeding, shorten the time of bladder irrigation and indwelling catheter, and has the value of clinical application. |
[1] GAO Y A,HUANG Y,ZHANG R,et al.Benign prostatic hyperplasia:prostatic arterial embolization versus transurethral resection of the prostate-a prospective,randomized,and controlled clinical trial[J].Radiology,2014,270(3):920-928.
[2] BILHIM T,BAGLA S,SAPOVAL M,et al.Prostatic arterial embolization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia[J].Radiology,2015,276(1):310-311.
[3] 杜依青,米白冰,王珏,等.经尿道等离子双极电切术与传统单极电切术治疗前列腺增生症比较的Meta分析[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,2014,19(7):456-461.
[4] TANG K,XU Z,XIA D,et al.Early outcomes of thulium laser versus transurethral resection of the prostate for managing benign prostatic hyperplasia:a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies[J].J Endourol,2014,28(1):65-72.
[5] ELHILALI M M.Management of BPH,larger than 100 ml:simple prostatectomy,versus laser transurethral surgery[J].World J Urol,2015,33(6):902-903.
[6] 钟秀宏,陈钱,张春阳,等.雌激素及雌激素受体与良性前列腺增生症[J].中国男科学杂志,2015,29(8):62-65.
[7] 甘露,曾静,黄桂晓,等.经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术与耻骨上经膀胱前列腺切除术治疗良性前列腺增生的疗效和安全性比较[J].医学综述,2014,20(5):959-960.
[8] 黄明坦,叶泽兵,刘百川,等.经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切治疗高危良性前列腺增生症的临床疗效观察[J].海南医学,2014,25(4):498-500.
[9] 关喜彬,武良,舒则荣,等.经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术安全性与有效性的系统评价[J].浙江创伤外科,2015,20(4):641-644.
[10] LUSUARDI L,HRUBY S,JANETSCHEK G,et al.Laparoscopic adenomectomy versus Eraser laser enucleation of the prostate[J].World J Urol,2015,33(5):691-696.
[11] 熊文清,万建,付明.经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术治疗大体积良性前列腺增生症疗效观察[J].临床外科杂志,2015,23(10):789-791.
[12] 徐磊,张国庆,车宪平.经尿道前列腺切除术前列腺电切综合征的防治探讨[J].检验医学与临床,2014,11(15):2153-2154.
[13] 孙炜.经尿道前列腺切除术并发症的原因及防治分析[J].中外医学研究,2016,14(8):120-121.
[14] ZANG Y C,DENG X X,YANG D R,et al.Photoselective vaporization of the prostate with GreenLight 120-W laser versus transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia:a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J].LIMS,2015,31(2):1-6.
[15] 罗彬,李正明,李刚,等.经尿道等离子前列腺剜除术和电切术治疗前列腺增生的效果比较[J].中国医药导报,2014,11(20):28-30. |
