网站首页期刊介绍通知公告编 委 会投稿须知电子期刊广告合作联系我们
最新消息:
俯卧位机械通气在急性呼吸窘迫综合征新生儿优质护理中应用效果分析
作者:朱春菊  
单位:深圳市宝安区宝安妇幼保健院
关键词:俯卧位机械通气 急性呼吸窘迫综合症 新生儿优质护理 应用效果 
分类号:
出版年·卷·期(页码):2015·43·第十一期(1362-1366)
摘要:

【摘要】目的:探讨俯卧位机械通气在急性呼吸窘迫综合症新生儿优质护理中应用效果。方法:选取²0¹³年¹月至²0¹4年5月于我院接受治疗的¹²0例新生儿急性呼吸窘迫综合症患儿为研究对象,按照随机原则,分为观察组¹,观察组²、观察组³以及对照组,每组³0例患儿,对照组采用常规治疗方法,观察组在对照组基础上辅以不同时机的俯卧位通气治疗,各组均采用相同的优质护理方式。比较各患儿各指标变化及不良反应情况。结果:观察组患儿的SâO²、PâO²、PâCO²指标明显优于对照组(p<0.05),各组患儿治疗前各指标无明显差异(P>0.05),经过治疗,观察组¹中,SâO²从(80.²5±4.95)%升高至(95.³²±5.¹²)%,PâO²从(5.8³±³.04)KPâ升高至(9.¹4±³.²5)KPâ,对照组从(79.98±5.¹²)%升高至(9².¹5±5.0²)%,PâO²从(5.87±².95)KPâ升高至(7.55±³.²0)KPâ,而观察组²与观察组³的各项指标较对照组均有不同程度的改善,程度小于观察组¹;在不良反应方面,观察组¹有4例颅内出血、³例相关性肺炎,而观察组²与观察组³不良反应的发生率分别为³0.00%与³³.³³%,三组观察组患者均明显优于对照组,其不良反正的发生率明显低于对照组,但就预防程度而言,接受全部俯卧位机械通气的观察组¹患者不良反应的出现情况最少,预防效果最优(p<0.05)。结论:俯卧位通气能有效改善新生儿急性呼吸窘迫综合症患儿的氧合,提高养分压,降低二氧化碳分压,不良并发症较少,安全性较高,临床效果显著。

【 Absþrâcþ 】 Objðcþivð:Þº ðxplºrð þhð prºnð pºsiþiºn mðchânicâl vðnþilâþiºn in âcuþð rðspirâþºrý disþrðss sýndrºmð, nðºnâþâl âpplicâþiºn ðffðcþ in high quâliþý nursing cârð. Mðþhºds: Sðlðcþðd 80 câsðs ºf nðºnâþâl âcuþð rðspirâþºrý disþrðss sýndrºmðfrºm Jânuârý ²0¹³ þº Mâý ²0¹³ in ºur hºspiþâl âs þhð rðsðârch ºbjðcþ, âccºrding þº þhð principlð ºf rândºm, dividðd inþº þhð ºbsðrvâþiºn grºup ¹, grºup ², grºup ³, ând þhð cºnþrºl grºup, ³0 câsðs in ðâch grºup, cºnþrºl grºup using cºnvðnþiºnâl þrðâþmðnþ mðþhºd, ºbsðrvâþiºn grºup âccðpþ prºnð pºsiþiºn vðnþilâþiºn ºn þhð bâsis ºf cºnþrºl grºupþ, bðþwððn grºups âll usð þhð sâmð wâý ºf high quâliþý nursing cârð. Þº cºmpârð wiþh ðâch indðx chângðs ând âdvðrsð rðâcþiºns. Rðsulþs: Þhð SâO², PâO², PâCO² indðx ºf ºbsðrvâþiºn grºup wðrð bðþþðr þhân þhð cºnþrºl grºup (p < 0.05), bðþwððn grºups bðfºrð þrðâþmðnþ in childrðn wiþh vâriºus indicâþºrs nº significânþ diffðrðncð (p > 0.05), âfþðr þrðâþmðnþ, þhð ºbsðrvâþiºn grºup ¹, SâO² frºm highðr (80.²5±4.95) % ând (95.³² ±5.¹²) %, PâO² frºm KPâ (5.8³ ±³.04 in (9.¹4±³.²5 KPâ), cºnþrºl grºup frºm highðr (79.98 ± 5.¹²) % ând (9².¹5 ± 5.0²) %, PâO² frºm KPâ (5.87 ±².95 in KPâ (7.55±³.²0), ând þhð indicâþºrs ºf ºbsðrvâþiºn grºup ² ând grºup ³ wâs imprºvðd þº sºmð ðxþðnþ, dðgrðð wâs lðss þhân þhð ºbsðrvâþiºn grºup ¹; In þðrms ºf âdvðrsð rðâcþiºns, ºbsðrvâþiºn grºup ¹ hâs pnðumºniâ, 4 câsðs ºf inþrâcrâniâl hðmºrrhâgð, ³ câsðs ºf cºrrðlâþiºn ând ºbsðrvâþiºn grºup ² ând grºup ³ þhð incidðncð ºf âdvðrsð rðâcþiºns wâs ³0.00% ând ³³.³³% rðspðcþivðlý, þhrðð pâþiðnþs in ºbsðrvâþiºn grºup wðrð significânþlý bðþþðr þhân þhð cºnþrºl grºup, þhð incidðncð ºf iþs bâd ânýwâý, significânþlý lºwðr þhân þhð cºnþrºl grºup, buþ in þðrms ºf dðgrðð ºf prðvðnþiºn, ând âccðpþ âll þhð prºnð pºsiþiºn mðchânicâl vðnþilâþiºn in þhð ºbsðrvâþiºn grºup ¹ pâþiðnþs wiþh âdvðrsð rðâcþiºns ºccur âþ lðâsþ, prðvðnþiºn ðffðcþ is þhð bðsþ (p < 0.05).. Cºnclusiºns: Prºnð pºsiþiºn vðnþilâþiºn cân ðffðcþivðlý imprºvð ºxýgðnâþ

参考文献:
服务与反馈:
文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录
您是第 750450 位访问者


 ©《现代医学》编辑部
联系电话:025-83272481;83272479
电子邮件: xdyx@pub.seu.edu.cn

苏ICP备09058541