网站首页期刊介绍通知公告编 委 会投稿须知电子期刊广告合作联系我们
最新消息:
地佐辛联合曲马多在全麻苏醒期急性疼痛中的应用
作者:冯慧  
单位:湖北医药学院附属太和医院麻醉科
关键词:地佐辛 曲马多 全身麻醉 苏醒期 术后疼痛 
分类号:
出版年·卷·期(页码):2014··第一期(0-)
摘要:

【摘要】:目的:探讨地佐辛联合曲马多在全麻苏醒期急性疼痛中应用的有效性及安全性。方法: 选取我院2012年1月-2012年12月收治择期行全麻开腹腹部手术患者120例,随机均分为地佐辛组(D组)、舒芬太尼组(S组)、地佐辛+曲马多组(DQ组),各40例,分别在关腹前30 min,D组:静脉注射地佐辛0.1 mg/kg;S组:静脉注射舒芬太尼0.1μg/kg;DQ组:肌肉注射地佐辛0.1 mg/kg+曲马多2mg/kg。观察3组患者自主呼吸恢复时间、苏醒时间及拔管时间、麻醉恢复室(PACU)停留时间;苏醒期疼痛(VAS)评分,镇静躁动(SAS)评分,舒适度(BCS)评分,并记录呼吸抑制、嗜睡、头晕、恶心、呕吐等不良反应的情况。结果:自主呼吸恢复时间、苏醒时间、拔管时间、三组比较,S组较延长,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);PACU停留时间,三组比较,S组明显延长,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);三组患者苏醒后的VAS、SAS、BCS评分比较,DQ组和S组VAS评分与SAS低于D组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);DQ组和S组BCS评分明显高于D组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);DQ组不良反应发生率小于S组和D组。结论:三组给药方式均能有效缓解麻醉苏醒期急性疼痛,但肌肉注射地佐辛联合曲马多患者镇痛效果好,作用时间长,苏醒迅速,苏醒质量较高,不良反应最少,优于舒芬太尼组和静脉使用地佐辛组。

【 abstract 】Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of dezocine combined with tramadol to postoperative pain in the analepsia stage of general anesthesia. Methods: 120 inpatients of our hospital from January 2012 to December 2012 undergoing open abdominal surgery were randomly divided into 3 groups, dezocine group (group D), sufentanil group (group S), and dezocine + tramadol group (group DQ), 40 cases in each group. 30 minutes before the end of the operation, patients in group D were intravenous injected dezocine 0.1 mg / kg; patients in group S were intravenous injected sufentanil 0.1μg / KG, and patients in group DQ were intramuscular injected dezocine 0.1 mg / kg + tramadol 2mg/kg. we observed the spontaneous breathing recovery time, palinesthesia time and extubation time, postanesthesia care unit (PACU) stay time; Awakening period pain (VAS) score, calm, agitated (SAS) score and comfort (BCS) score, and recorded the respiratory depression, drowsiness, dizziness, nausea, vomiting and other adverse reactions of patients in the 3 groups. Results: Spontaneous breathing recovery time, palinesthesia time, extubation time are longer in group S, but compare with other groups, the differences have no statistically significant.(P> 0.05); PACU stay time is longer in group S, the difference has statistically significant (P <0.05); compare the VAS, SAS, BCS scores in 3 groups after palinesthesia, the VAS and SAS are lower in group S and group DQ than in the group D, and the differences have statistically significant (P <0.05); BCS score is higher in group S and group DQ than that in group D, the differences have statistically significant (P <0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions of group DQ is lower than that in other 2 groups. Conclusions: the 3 modes of administration are all can effectively alleviate the acute pain in the analepsia stage of general anesthesia. Intramuscular injection of dezocine combined with tramadol with longer action time, shorter P

参考文献:
服务与反馈:
文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录
您是第 752422 位访问者


 ©《现代医学》编辑部
联系电话:025-83272481;83272479
电子邮件: xdyx@pub.seu.edu.cn

苏ICP备09058541