网站首页期刊介绍通知公告编 委 会投稿须知电子期刊广告合作联系我们
最新消息:
无保护左主干病变随机临床研究的meta分析:药物涂层支架与冠状动脉旁路移植术的一年结果比较
作者:王栋  
单位:东南大学医学院
关键词:无保护左主干病变 经皮冠状动脉介入术 冠状动脉旁路移植术 药物涂层支架 meta分析 
分类号:
出版年·卷·期(页码):2013··第三期(0-)
摘要:

目的:比较冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)和经皮冠状动脉介入术(PCI)治疗无保护左主干病变(ULMCA)疗效和安全性。方法:通过检索Pubmed,EMBASE和Cochrane数据库有关在治疗ULMCA上的两种方法对比的随机临床研究,人群为经冠状动脉造影确诊的ULMCA,干预措施为PCI和CABG,主要结果为死亡、心肌梗死、脑血管事件、再次血运重建、主要心脑血管事件(MACCE)。结果:纳入4篇文献,共1611人。1年随访结果,DES在死亡率(OR 0.73,95%CI 0.43-1.26)、心肌梗死率(OR 1.09,95%CI 0.59-2.01)、MACCE发生率(OR 1.04,95%CI 0.77-1.39)与CABG相比差异无统计学意义,但是DES脑血管事件风险(OR 0.18,95%CI 0.05-0.70)显著降低,而再次血运重建风险(OR 2.21,95%CI 1.51-3.22)显著增高。结论:DES与CABG在治疗ULMCA上1年死亡率、心肌梗死率、MACCE发生率上相当,但DES脑血管事件风险较低,再次血运重建风险较高。

Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with drug-eluting stent (DES) in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease. Methods: Pubmed,EMBASE and Cochrane Library Database were searched for randomized controlled clinical studies that reported outcomes comparing PCI with DES with CABG for the treatment of ULMCA disease. Primary outcomes were death, myocardial infarction(MI), cerebrovascular accident(CVA), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events(MACCE) and repeat revascularization. Result: At one-year follow-up, there was no significant difference between the CABG and DES group in the risk for death(OR 0.73,95%CI 0.43-1.26),MI(OR 1.09,95%CI 0.59-2.01),MACCE(OR 2.21,95%CI 1.51-3.22). The risk of CVA was significantly lower in the DES group compared with the CABG group(OR 0.18,95%CI 0.05-0.70),but higher risk of repeat revascularization(OR 2.21,95%CI 1.51-3.22).Conclusions: PCI with DES is associated with favorable outcomes for death,MI,MACCE and a low risk of CVA compared to CABG in patients with ULMCA disease,but with a higher risk of repeat revascularization .

参考文献:
服务与反馈:
文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录
您是第 752729 位访问者


 ©《现代医学》编辑部
联系电话:025-83272481;83272479
电子邮件: xdyx@pub.seu.edu.cn

苏ICP备09058541