网站首页期刊介绍通知公告编 委 会投稿须知电子期刊广告合作联系我们
最新消息:
TAPP与Li-chtenstein疝修补术治疗成人复发性腹股沟疝的疗效及术后疼痛SF-MPQ评分变化
作者:陆晶晶  吴永丰 
单位:东南大学 附属中大医院江北院区/南京市大厂医院, 江苏 南京 210000
关键词:腹股沟疝 复发 腹腔镜 疝修补术 术后疼痛 
分类号:R656.2+1
出版年·卷·期(页码):2019·47·第二期(117-122)
摘要:

目的:对比分析腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)与Li-chtenstein修补术治疗成人复发性腹股沟疝的疗效及对患者术后SF-MPQ评分的影响。方法:收集2014年1月至2017年1月我院收治的成人复发性腹股沟疝患者99例随机分为两组:观察组53例行TAPP治疗,对照组40例行Li-chtenstein修补术。对比两组围手术期指标,术后1 d、7 d、3个月、6个月、12个月,采用简版McGill疼痛问卷(SF-MPQ)评价疼痛情况,统计术后慢性疼痛发生率、复发率。结果:两组的手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组的术中出血量、术后首次下床活动时间、住院时间均较对照组明显降低(P<0.05);术后1 d、7 d、3个月、6个月,观察组的SF-MPQ评分显著低于对照组(P<0.05);术后12个月,组间SF-MPQ评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组术后慢性疼痛及总并发症发生率分别为3.39%、8.47%,显著低于对照组的15.00%、27.50%(P<0.05);观察组术后随访未再复发,对照组1例(2.50%)复发,组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:TAPP是治疗成人复发性腹股沟疝的有效术式,术后康复快、安全性好且慢性疼痛少。

Objective:To compare the efficacy of laparoscopic trans-abdominal preperitoneal prosthetic repair(TAPP) and Li-chtenstein inguinal herniorrhaphy for adult recurrent inguinal hernia and the influence on postoperative pain SF-MPQ score. Methods:99 casesof adultswith recurrent inguinal hernia from January 2014 to January 2017 in our hospital were enrolled, who were randomly divided into two groups:59 patients in the observation grouptreated with laparoscopic trans-abdominal preperitoneal prosthetic repair(TAPP), 40 patients in the control group treated with Li-chtenstein inguinal herniorrhaphy.The perioperative indicators were compared between the two groups,the Short-form MPQ(SF-MPQ) was used to evaluate the painat on the 1st day,7th day,in 3rd month,6th month and 12th month after surgery,the incidence of postoperative chronic pain and recurrence rate was compared. Results:There was no significant difference in the operative time between the two groups(P>0.05),the intraoperative blood loss, out-of-bed activity time and the hospital stay in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.05). On the1st day,7th day,3rd month, in the 6th month after surgery, SF-MPQ score in the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group(P<0.05),but there was no significant difference in the SF-MPQ score in the 12th month after surgery between the two groups(P>0.05);The postoperative chronic pain and total complication rate in the observation group were 3.39% and 8.47%, respectively, which were significantly lower than 15.00% and 27.50% in the control group(P<0.05); No more recurrence was found in the observation group,and one patient(2.50%) recurrence,there was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05). Conclusion:TAPP is an effective treatment for adult recurrent inguinal hernia, for itsrapid recovery, good safety and less chronic pain.

参考文献:

[1] 王明刚,申英末,陈杰,等.腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前疝修补技术治疗复发性腹股沟疝的疗效观察[J].中华医学杂志,2016,96(20):1588-1590.
[2] 汤建康,王维佳,张仕运,等.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的术后疼痛分析[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2015,20(12):940-942.
[3] 中华医学会外科学分会疝和腹壁外科学组,中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会.成人腹股沟疝诊疗指南(2014年版)[J].中华外科杂志,2014,52(7):481-484.
[4] WRIGHT K D,ASMUNDSON G J,MCCREARY D R.Factorial validity of the short-form McGill pain questionnaire(SF-MPQ)[J].Eur J Pain,2001,5(3):279-284.
[5] 王文瑞,李健文,王骥,等.复发性腹股沟疝的临床特点和腹腔镜手术方式选择[J].中华消化外科杂志,2015,14(10):827-831.
[6] 陈宁波,曾杰.局麻下应用UHS与Lichtenstein两种术式治疗腹股沟疝的疗效对比分析[J].临床外科杂志,2016,24(2):127-129.
[7] 杨佳华,华蕾,郑侃,等.腔镜全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术与Lichtenstein修补术的临床比较分析[J].浙江临床医学,2016,18(10):1891-1893.
[8] SIMONS M P,AUFENACKER T,BAYNIELSEN M,et al.European hernia society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients[J].Hernia,2009,13(4):343-403.
[9] 黄海锋,张春军,喻海波,等.腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术与开放腹膜前无张力疝修补术的对比分析[J].浙江医学,2015,37(2):140-142.
[10] GODSHALL E,ECKHOUSE S,JOHNSON C,et al.Transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair as a salvage operation after failure of prior total extraperitoneal repair[J].Am Surg,2015,81(8):312-313.
[11] 陈鑫,王文瑞,李健文,等.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术在复发性腹股沟疝治疗中的临床应用[J].外科理论与实践,2015,20(1):57-60.
[12] 刘意,钱峻,吴建波.免固定与钉枪钉合腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前补片植入术治疗腹股沟疝的疗效比较[J].实用临床医药杂志,2014,18(23):90-91.
[13] 程家平,文坤明,李建国,等.腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前疝修补与开放式网塞填充式无张力修补术治疗腹股沟复发疝对比分析[J].重庆医学,2017,46(20):2842-2844.
[14] TRAN H,TRAN K,ZAJKOWSKA M,et al. Single-port onlay mesh repair of recurrent inguinal hernias after failed anterior and laparoscopic repairs[J].JSLS,2015,19(1):e2014.00212
[15] 陈胜才,何海荣,胡趣儿.三种不同腹腔镜术式治疗老年复发性腹股沟疝的临床效果比较[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2015,20(2):99-102.
[16] 仝传志,阿吉木·阿不力克木.腹腔镜微创术式与Lichtenstein修补术治疗老年复发性腹股沟疝的临床对比观察[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2016,15(6):573-576.
[17] 邸宣,邱爽,刘丽宏.成人腹股沟疝术后慢性疼痛研究[J].临床药物治疗杂志,2015,13(5):57-61.
[18] 吴巨钢,姜波健.腹股沟疝修补术后慢性疼痛的预防策略进展[J].国际外科学杂志,2015,42(9):634-637.
[19] 刘汇明,田庆,袁义磊,等.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术与Lichtenstein术治疗成年人腹股沟复发疝的术后疼痛分析[J].中国医师进修杂志,2017,40(4):325-328.
[20] PISANU A,PODDA M,SABA A,et al.Meta-analysis and review of prospective randomized trials comparing laparoscopic and Lichtenstein techniques in recurrent inguinal hernia repair[J].Hernia,2015,19(3):355-366.

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录
您是第 262007 位访问者


 ©《现代医学》编辑部
联系电话:025-83272481;83272479
电子邮件: xdyx@pub.seu.edu.cn

苏ICP备09058541